Tarikh dan masa

Thursday, May 14, 2015

The Double Standard Of Western Leaders

The world on edge as Moscow and the West face off - February, 2015

The world is on edge as Russia and Western powers face off in eastern Europe and in the Middle East. The political climate throughout the region has not been this volatile, this unpredictable since the Second World War. A continuous arc starting from eastern Europe to the southern tip of the Middle East has been turned into a boiling cauldron in recent years. Exactly a century after the onset of the First World War, humanity faces the possibility of yet another man-made calamity. And similar to factors that led humanity to the unprecedented blood-lettings of the first and second world wars, the Anglo-American-Jewish political order once again figures prominently in the current calculus. The Anglo-American-Jewish Western alliance is in fact the primary source of problems we see throughout the world.

What humanity is facing today is a global offensive by Western powers to preserve their global hegemony.Their ultimate goal is to contain Russia, Iran and China, because the aforementioned three, Russia in particular, pose long-term threats to their power. Their effort to undermine the growing influence of Moscow, Tehran and Beijing is essentially what has brought the world today to the precipice of a new world war. Even Westerners are beginning to understand this -
Stratfor: Ukraine Coup Plotted by US Over Russian Stance on Syria:http://sputniknews.com/politics/20141219/1016024377.html 
Stratfor: ‘US fears a resurgent Russia’: http://rt.com/news/216043-stratfor-relations-russia-usa/
World order principles should be changed to avoid 3rd world war — Italian journalist: http://itar-tass.com/en/world/768197
Viewpoint: Why the shadow of WW1 and 1989 hangs over world events:http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30483873
Thankfully, awareness of and resistance to Western imperialism is growing around the world. The Russian Federation, in particular, has become the front-line as well as the spearhead of the current global resistance effort against the West. 

Ten years ago I began proclaiming throughout Cyberia that Russia was the long awaited messiah, the miraculously resurrected superpower that would save mankind by creating the modern foundations of a multi-polar world. For ten years I have been heralding the rise of Russia as humanity's last front against American imperialism, Globalism, Westernization, Wahhabi Islamic extremism, Zionism and pan-Turkism. Seven years ago I was ecstatic about the sudden reawakening of the Russian Bear as it angrily rampaged throughout Georgia in an attempt to salvage important remnants of its severely compromised ecosystem. But even after Georgia, even after the onset of what looked to be a new Cold War between the East and the West, I could not even begin to imagine where we are today -
In a historic dispute with the West, Russia reclaims Crimea (March, 2014):http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2014/03/in-historic-dispute-with-west-russia.html
Karabakhization of eastern Ukraine (May, 2014):http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2014/06/karabakhization-of-eastern-ukraine-as.html
 Driving a Sunni wedge in the Shiite Arc (June, 2014): http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2014/07/driving-sunni-wedge-in-shiite-arc-june_18.html
Worried for its loss of hegemony the West is bent on bringing down Russia (July, 2014): http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2014/08/worried-for-its-lose-of-hegemony-west.html
Trouble Brewing For the World's Policeman (December, 2014):http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2014/12/trouble-brewing-for-worlds-policeman.html
Who would have thought that Libya and Syria would fall apart like they have? Who would have thought that Russia would almost single-handedly save Bashar Assad's government? Who would have thought that the West would embark on a major crusade to curb growing Shiite influence in the Middle East. Who would have thought that a new, barbaric extremist group supported by the West and its allies would establish a ruthless theocratic state on Syrian and Iraqi territory? Who would have guessed that Crimea would be part of Russia once more? Who in their wildest imagination would have thought that NATO and Russian forces would be facing off in Ukraine in the twenty-first century?

What we are seeing take place in Ukraine, Syria, Iraq and Yemen currently - and the war like situation that has developed between Armenia and Azerbaijan - may one day be looked upon as the preliminary stages of a third world war. Tension is steadily building throughout the region. If deescalation does not take place and the prevailing situation persists, the boiling cauldron is bound to explode and when it does Armenia will be in the epicenter of it. We are again at this juncture in world history because we the sheeple continue to be easily manipulated and led astray by those who control global levers of manipulation. We are again at this juncture in world history essentially because of Western powers' desire to maintain supremacy in global affairs. We are at this juncture in world history essentially because Western powers want to maintain a certain standard-of-living at home.

The Western world is therefore doing what it has done best throughout history: Bringing order through chaos. 

The order in question is of course a Western global order, also known as the One World Order. This is the political paradigm in which Western powers and their satellites dominate every aspect of global affairs. This is a world order in which the world's wealth is controlled primarily by Anglo-American-Jews; a world where the sheeple is racially mixed and speaks English; a world in which notions about God, family and country are looked down upon; a world where apostolic Christianity and European culture is demonized; a world in which homosexuality, birth control and women's liberation are promoted as a way of artificially curbing population growth; a world where everyone adopts and worships Anglo-American-Jewish values. 

While some in the West (i.e. Neocons) believe this world order can best be achieved through economic warfare, armed intervention and fomenting revolutions in targeted countries, others, like veteran politicians such as Henry Kissinger, believe such a political global order should be achieved via diplomatic means and economic/financial baiting. Regardless of the method, however, their ultimate goal is comprehensive global hegemony. Consequently, the geostrategic desire to maintain Western supremacy over the world is thus the common thread we see within most of the bloodletting around the world today.

One of the great talents of the Anglo-American-Jewish political order is their uncanny ability to meddle in the internal affairs of nations around the world. Using their massive technological, cultural, financial, economic and political influences, they are able to go to virtually any spot on earth today and exploit societal grievances, political mismanagement, old biases and ethnic hatreds.


To better understand what they do, imagine a great power coming to North America one day and exploiting domestic problems that exists inside American society. Imagine what would happen if the central government in the United States was so weak one day that a great foreign power was able to establish itself in Mexico. Imagine what would happen if a foreign power was able to recruit, organize, finance and arm separatist such as Mexicans, Muslims, Hispanics, American Indians and/or African Americans in the US against the country's WASP/Jewish establishment. Imagine what would happen if a power came to North American shores, established thousands of NGOs and propaganda outlets and began systematically making a play on the anger and emotions of the tens-of-millions of poor and disenfranchised in the US.

In such a scenario, the US would fall apart rather spectacularly. But isn't what I just described above exactly what Western powers are doing around the world?

But let's not hold our breaths waiting for any world power to come to North America's shores. Since 1812 we have been living in an Anglo-American-Jewish period in world history. This era is not about to go through any drastic changes, at least not in the near future. The aforementioned trinity therefore currently has the high ground, the initiative, the tools and the global levers to meddle, manipulate and exploit anywhere it wants. Nations resisting the political West will therefore be on the defensive for the foreseeable future. 

How did we get to this juncture? The blame ultimately goes to we the sheeple because it is our materialism, our hatreds, our biases, our political illiteracy, our shortsightedness and our ignorance of the world we live in that gives them their powers. But there is hope. While it is not nearly as powerful as the Western political order, the Russian nation today - thanks to its political acumen, natural wealth, warrior culture, deep rooted nationalism and massive nuclear arsenal - is the only political entity on earth today capable of standing in the way of the West's desire for total world domination. This is why I and many others like myself consider Russian President Vladimir Putin to be quite literally God sent. Just like when mother nature takes corrective measures to bring about order and balance in ecology, the Russian president was destined by higher, supernatural powers for his earthly task. Although they may not realize it, the Russian nation is doing God's work on earth. And this work began in earnest in 2008.

Kosovo set today's precedence


Remember Kosovo? Remember how in the spring of 1999 they used a ruthless aerial bombing campaign in Serbia to sever this historically Serbian region from Belgrade and place it essentially under Albano-Turco-Islamic rule? Now that Moscow is resorting to similar measures to correct the wrongs of history, why are Western powers shocked?


I cannot help but laugh now when I see visibly frightened Western officials talk about the dangers of "military interventionism" and the "inviolability of national borders" in reference to Russian actions in eastern Ukraine. These cowardly reptiles need to be reminded of their crimes against Vietnam, Laos, Cuba, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria. These hypocritical reptiles need to be reminded about Granada, Diego Garcia, Panama, Guantanamo Bay, Northern Ireland, Malvinas and the illegally annexed Mexican territories of south-western United States. After all, haven't these Turcophile reptiles been tolerating the Turkish occupation of northern Cyprus for the past forty years? Haven't these Anglo-American-Jewish reptiles been tolerating the Israeli occupation of the West Banks and Gaza for the past fifty years? Didn't these bloodthirsty reptiles create a Kurdistan out of Iraqi territory? Didn't these despicable reptiles sow the seeds of civil war in Ukraine by funding an armed uprising against the democratically elected government in Kiev a little over a years ago? But if a precise date is to be placed on the start of the global mess we are in today, it would be February, 2008 -
Independence for Kosovo (February, 2008):http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2009/02/its-finally-happening.html
Zbigniew Brzezinski: Kosovo not Precedent for Abkhazia, South Ossetia or Karabakh (March, 2008): http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2009/02/with-historic-land-disputes-with-its.html
Putin Says `War Has Started' (August, 2008):http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2009/03/this-is-it.html
Russia Recognizes Georgian Regions (August, 2008):http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2009/05/specter-of-western-crimes-against.html
The Western decision to grant independence to Kosovo set the precedence for events that would later take place in Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Crimea and Novorossia. The violent, arrogant and flagrant manner in which Kosovo was removed from Serbia and placed under a Western-backed Albano-Turco-Islamic rule was the geostrategic alarm that forced the Russian Bear into action. Prior to Kosovo's independence, international order in Eurasia was, relatively speaking, being upheld. All sides at least pretended to uphold international law. After Kosovo, all pretenses essentially ended. Kosovo made it starkly apparent to Russian policymakers that the Anglo-American-Jewish world order had to be challenged wherever and whenever possibleMerely six months after the proclamation of Kosovo's independence, the Russian Bear stood before a historic opportunity to do just that. In a direct challenge to the Anglo-American-Jewish alliance,  Russia took the opportunity presented by the Western-backed Georgian President Saakashvili's aggression against South Ossetia by sending tank armies into Georgia to liberate both South Ossetia and Abkhazia. February, 2008 was the historic moment when the Russian Bear awoke. The summer of 2008 was a historic turning point, a pivotal time that may one day be looked upon as the time in history when Western global hegemony began its decline.

A final brief note on Kosovo: Albanians, like their European counterparts Bulgarians, Rumanians, Bosnians, Hungarians, Cypriots and Greeks have proven once more that being in the Western political/economic orbit is in no way a panacea to socioeconomic problems and may in fact be detrimental to national development -
Nevertheless, the path we are on today was paved during the years when Western powers began taking advantage of a weak, post-Soviet Russia by redrawing the borders of eastern Europe and the Middle East. Western powers thus sowed the seeds of today's turmoil. Let's hope that Mother Russia is able to correct the wrongs of history. More importantly, let's hope for multipolarity in international affairs in the future. Until we there, however, there will be many hurdles along the way because Western powers will not easily give up their global hegemony.

Winter offensive in Novorossia

Unless their destructive political policies around the world begin hurting them at home, they will continue with their destructive political policies around the world. As long as the threat of war is on their enemy's border and not theirs, they will continue their aggression around the world. Unbeknownst to many, several weeks ago American officials set the stage for arms deliveries to Ukraine -
If Washington goes ahead and begins providing lethal weaponry to the junta in Kiev, it will be seen as a declaration of war against Russia. If this happens we will be in uncharted territory. Unless sober mindscome forward to change the current political calculus prevailing in Washington, we will be steadily heading towards a major international configuration. In the meanwhile, however, some of the wrongs of history are currently being systematically corrected by Russian-backed militants.

Russian-backed fighters of Novorossia were recently on a brilliantly executed winter offensive. The Western-backed junta's military has suffered yet another major defeat. A strategically located airport in Donetsk and a strategic rail hub at Debaltsevo have been liberated as a result, the strategic port city if Mariupol may be next. All indicators suggest that 2015 may prove disastrous for the chocolate king. European powers are incapable of helping Kiev. Western powers are incapable of helping Kiev. The sociopolitical climate in Kiev is slowly reaching dangerous levels. We may even seen another Maidan uprising before this year is over. 

Moscow's war effort in Novorossia was slow and sloppy in the beginning. But what a brilliant display of warcraft it has been since. I can't properly express how impressed I am at how well Moscow has been orchestrating its proxy war in eastern Ukraine. The way they have maneuvered between diplomacy and covert war fighting has been masterful to say the least. They have also been very effective, surprisingly effective, in the information war. Their leader, Alexander Zakharchenko, has been nothing less than amazing. The man, who was recently wounded in combat, is one of those natural born leaders that appear almost out of nowhere in times of great travail.

Russians have once again risen to the occasion. Slavs, men and women alike, Russians in particular, are indeed a warrior breed within the human ecology. Whereas other nations need either cutting edge war fighting technology (westerners), fanaticism (Muslims), racist indoctrination (Jews) or the threat of annihilation (Armenians) to get their people to fight, Slavs are naturally, organically ready for war; all they seem to require is a steady supply of cigarets and vodka. As long as Russia keeps producing such men and women, the Russian nation will never be defeated. As long as Moscow can keep "Western values" out of Russian society, Russia will continue giving birth to such warriors. If I had to go to war I can't think of a better people to go to war with. It would be wise for Armenians to form a confederation with these people. Knowing the south Caucasus, we will sooner-or-later need their assistance -
UAF POWs abused by Givi and taken to parade through the city destroyed by UAF artillery: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FD15bxM3mTc

Assault on the New Terminal combat footage 16-18 January "Donbas under fire" documentary: http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2015/01/assault-on-new-terminal-combat-footage.html

Zakharchenko hands over the bodies of UAF KIAs, POWs:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FSbvbzwOb8 
First footage of a mass surrender of Ukrainian troops:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRiEKCaH2iA
Зачистка Дебальцево: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqliEMkzVQQ
Фронтовые дневники. Дебальцевский крест: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qi8ixn6-Vo
With Moscow's rebels on a steady march in south-eastern Ukraine, Western powers are in a serious bind. Moscow has outmaneuvered them in every regard. Moscow now has Western powers in a serious predicament. If the West doesn't militarily help Kiev, more Ukrainian territory will be lost in the east. If they do help Kiev, Moscow will increase the volume and quality of its military assistance to the rebels and more Ukrainian territory will be lost in the east - perhaps at a faster pace. If Western powers don't help the junta in Kiev in any significant way, they run the risk of looking impotent, worthless and backstabbing, much more so than in the aftermath of the 2008 war in Georgia. There is yet another aspect to this political calculus: If Western powers begin providing Kiev with advanced weaponry, not only will they face losing more Ukrainian territory in a Russian backlash, they will also face the possibility of advanced Russian arms going to Iran and HezbollahOne of Washington's gravest fears is to see Moscow providing sophisticated arms to Iran and Hezbollah. Western powers know that once they cross their limits in Ukraine (and Syria) Moscow is more than willing to provide Iran and Hezbollah with very lethal weaponry. Moscow hasn't done so thus far precisely because it has wanted to keep this option as a viable leverage over the West. Armed with modern ballistic missiles, anti-aircraft missile systems, anti-ship missiles and anti-tank rockets, Iran and Hezbollah will be a formidable force in the Middle East for the foreseeable future. This is a nightmare scenario not only for Washington but also for London, Tel Aviv, Riyadh and Ankara.

So, will the West risk such a thing by providing lethal weaponry to Kiev, especially knowing that such aid will most probably not change the course of events on the ground in eastern Ukraine? And as noted above, not providing arms to Kiev runs the risk of making Western powers look backstabbing, impotent and unreliable. This is the dilemma the West faces. Sucks to be Uncle Sam. The unenviable position Washington has gotten itself into in Ukraine was best expressed recently by the warmongering war criminal, John McCain.

Nonetheless, I have no doubt that additional territories will be systematically liberated, especially now that the infamous tie-eating dictator, Saakashvili is advising Porochenko. But, unlike what Moscow did in Crimea, this time around, I do not think it will outright annex any of the liberated territories. In other words, Karabakhization of Novorossia is what's being foreseen by Russian officials.  Similar to how the political status quo in Nagorno Karabakh is used by Moscow to keep leverage over both Yerevan and Baku, Moscow will be using it's influence in Novorossia as a leverage over Kiev, NATO and eastern Ukraine. Moreover, and perhaps more importantly, the pro-Russian insurgency in Novorossia effectively takes Crimea out of any discussions. Notice that there has been very little talk in the West about Crimea's historicreunification with Mother Russia. As pro-Russian separatists grow in strength in Novorossia, Crimea will become a very distant memory for Kiev as well. It should be pointed out that Russia's successful annexation of the strategically important peninsula alone, so historic in its scope and brilliant in its execution, is ultimately why the Western-instigated crisis in the Ukraine will be a Russian victory - regardless of what happens in Kiev going forward.

With that said, it is obvious that Moscow would like to - one way or the other -  turn Ukraine into a dependency and eventually bring Kiev into a pact with Russia. But I strongly feel that regardless of what happens in Kiev, Novorossia, like Nagorno Karabakh, will henceforth be defacto part of Russia. Novorossia's ties with Moscow will be very close even if the region eventually becomes a semi-autonomous, federal province within Ukraine. From a Russian perspective, it would be very foolish if Moscow surrenders Novorossia to Ukraine - even if a pro-Russian government comes into power in Kiev. I do not think Moscow will give up its hard won ties in the region for any reason. I do not think Moscow will repeat the mistake of the Soviets. Nevertheless, in the short to midterm, Novorossia will be de facto part of Russia and the rest of Ukraine will be sort of a no man's land, a buffer zone between Russia and NATO.

If the West's strategic objective was to sever Ukraine away from Moscow and place it in the EU or NATO, it has been a miserable failure. If, however, the West's objective was to sow divisions between Europeans and Russians, then it's been somewhat of a victory. But such a victory will prove to be a short-lived one because Europeans are increasingly realizing that the current crisis in the Ukraine was instigated by Anglo-American-Jews and is thus against European interests. Europeans understand that the political West is seeking more control over Europe through this crisis. As a countermeasure to Western designs, Russian officials have been doing their best to keep relations with European powers cordial and healthy. This soft approach by Moscow will pay dividend in the future as more-and-more Europeans, Germans and French in particular, turn against Western powers. The key for Moscow here therefore is to continue presenting the negative impact that the crisis in Ukraine is having on the rest of Europe as a consequence of Western aggression and duplicity. Moscow's Russia Today news agency is doing an excellent job in this regard. Moscow needs to place more emphasis on the information war currently taking place. Moscow will have the clear advantage in this regard because to has the truth behind it. After all, the artificially created crisis in Ukraine was a Western operation to curb growing Russian influence in Europe. The current mess in the region was therefore not in Russia's or Europe's interest. For historical reference, the following are materials foretelling the crisis in Ukraine many years ago -
Russian politician Zhirinovsky vs Zbigniew Brzezinski (1/2) (English subs):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYe2ZamKQ78
Обама начнет третью мировую с Крыма?:http://newsland.com/news/detail/id/390375/
All in all, Uncle Sam has gotten itself stuck in some deep shit and nonconforming nations such as China, India, Serbia, Hungary, Greece, Armenia, Cyprus and Egypt are making it sink deeper and deeper into it. The troubling part here, however, is that when Uncle Sam is in deep shit - thanks to the far reaching tentacles of Westernization and Globalism - humanity also faces the risk of getting dragged into deep shit as well. And when the proverbial shit hits the fan, Armenia will be in the epicenter of it all.

Armenia in the epicenter

Our tiny, landlocked and impoverished homeland is surrounded by predatory animals in one of the most hostile ecosystems on earth. The south Caucasus is merely one bad event away from reverting back to being a Turkic/Islamic cesspool. Western machinations in the region has created a climate where such a scenario is very possible today. Needless to say, Russia (and to a lesser extent Iran) is Armenia's only deterrence factor in the south Caucasus. The long-term health and well-being of the Russian nation is thus crucially important for Armenians. The danger that the region faces today is the reason why Moscow has been signalling for the past few years that it will not hesitate to smash through Georgia to link-up with its strategically located 102nd military base in Armenia in the event of a major war in the region. The following is the most recent Russian warning as covered by John Hughes' CIA-sponsored ArmeniaNow propaganda outlet - 
New strategy or provocation?: Russian analyst’s article on “straight way” to Armenia via Georgia stirs controversy:http://armenianow.com/commentary/analysis/58344
Russia and Region: Moscow floats ideas on ensuring railroad link with Armenia via Georgia:http://armenianow.com/commentary/analysis/61051/armenia_russia_caucasus_troops_georgia
And here is a commentary on this very topic by Michael Maloof -
Russia Preparing Final Assault to Take Back Georgia:http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/russia-preparing-final-assault-to-take-back-georgia/
It's encouraging that this topic is being talked about by Western news media: It means they are worried about it, which also means there is validity behind such allegations. In my opinion, if Moscow is ever able to establish a common border with Armenia through Georgia and/or Azerbaijan, it will be a major geostrategic victory for Russia. Common borders with Armenia through Georgia and/or Azerbaijan will help Moscow gain DIRECT control over all three south Caucasus states. By doing so, it will also deal a swift death blow to Tbilisi's and Baku's ties to Ankara, Tel Aviv and Western powers. Needless to say, having common borders with Russia is also of great strategic importance to Armenia. Armenians therefore need to embark on a long-term, pan-national campaign to convince high ranking Russian - and Iranian officials - that a direct land link between Russia and Armenia is in the strategic interests of both Russia and Iran. Behind closed doors in the Kremlin, the following is more-or-less what Armenians need to be communicating to their Russian counterparts: 
Western powers, Turkey, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Israel are the main obstacles to lasting peace and stability in the greater Caucasus region. One of the ways to pacify the Caucasus region and allow Moscow to gain direct control over all three south Caucasus states is for Russia to have a common border with Armenia through Georgia and/or Azerbaijan. With a land connection between Russia and Armenia, the Western factor in Yerevan will virtually disappear overnight. By establishing a physical link with its most important and most reliable regional ally, Moscow would have the strategic benefit of cutting off Georgia from Azerbaijan, thereby weakening and isolating both Georgia and Azerbaijan and turning both Tbilisi and Baku into Russian dependencies. An Armenia that is fully within Moscow's orbit and sharing a common border with the Russian Federation is perhaps the only way to solve many of the persistent problems in the Caucasus region - including but not limited to Wahhabi Islamic extremism, pan-Turkism and Western expansionism.
The best time to create a land link between Russia and Armenia is when a war breaks-out in the region. The protection of Armenia (under CSTO charter) and the problem of resupplying Russia's 102nd base on the outskirts of Gyumri are some of the pretenses for the implementation of such a plan. Nevertheless, before any of this can happen, Armenian officials need to stop their dangerous flirtations with Western powers and put an end to Armenia's exposure to the political West. Armenian officials need to develop some political foresight and ideological backbone. Yerevan needs to place its emphasis on developing its north-south axis as a way of breathing life into Armenia's stagnant economy and establish links with developing nations beyond Russia and Iran. The development of economic cooperation between nations like Russia, Georgia, Armenia, Iran, India and China is what we are missing out on due to Western meddling in the Caucasus -
Russia supports India's full membership of SCO:http://www.timesca.com/news/15034-russia-supports-india-s-full-membership-of-sco
India to negotiate free trade zone with Russia-led Customs Union:http://rt.com/business/235731-india-russia-customs-union/
Iran to launch trade development center in Armenia:http://en.mehrnews.com/detail/News/106162
The above news items are very significant. These types of strategic regional projects - as well as regional superhighways - have been discussed by Moscow, Yerevan and Tehran for quite a few years. The only obstacle to their implementation has been Western meddling in the region. Georgia's West-leaning government, in particular, is the missing link. Tbilisi the regional party mainly responsible for keeping the south Caucasus economically desperate and politically volatile. Tbilisi has to be either brought to its senses or to its knees. If that will require Russian troops invading Georgia once more, then so be it. Use Javakhq or Abkhazia or South Ossetia to create a pretense and send in the beautiful tanks. The sooner Georgia is fixed, the sooner will Pax Russicana descend on to the region. The sooner Pax Russicana descends onto the region, the sooner will major economic projects for the region become a reality. And the sooner such projects become a reality, the sooner will Armenia finally breath.

The West's desire to undermine Russian and Iranian economic and infrastructure projects in the region reveals just how toxic the Western world has become in global affairs and just how dangerous Armenia's Western-led Russophobic activists are for the country.

I ask the Armenian reader to once more think of the "Caucasian table" where Turks, Georgians, Azeris, Persians, Wahhabi Islamists, Russians, Western oil interests and Armenians sit around and discuss regional matters. Think of this table without its Russian participant. In other words, think of how Armenia would have fared in the geopolitical climate of the region today had a handful of men, primarily the Karabakh clan, not been wise enough to keep Armenia firmly within the Russian orbit and allow the stationing of Russian troops on Armenian soil. Armenia has not suffered the fate of Cyprus, Serbia, Georgia, Syria or Ukraine only because of Russian boots on the ground in Armenia. Speaking of Syria, we may be nearing the end of the four year old nightmare.

The final chapter in Syria

The following is the link to an interview I saw a couple of months ago on Farid Zakaria's GPS show on CNN. The whole thing looked/felt/sounded like a rehearsed infomercial, not much unlike much of the news reporting we see all across the US these days. The topic discussed, however, was very serious. It is my opinion that they are in the process of finalizing the final chapter on the nation formerly known as Syria. With that in mind, watch Farid's interview with Professor Joshua Landis (who according to Farid is the "top Syria scholar in the US") very carefully and try to read between the lines of what's being said -

Is backing Syria rebels a mistake?

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/141107205532-exp-gps-landis-sot-syria-00025421-horizontal-gallery.jpg


The following are revealing excerpts from the above interview that tells it all -

"The map of 1919 which the British and French drew was wrong. [The new map of a partitioned Syria and Iraq] is the map that reflects the realities of sectarianism and is possibly more stable... [The state that ISIS has created stretching] from the edges of Baghdad all the way to Aleppo today is a Sunni state and it's already emerged. And what America is doing by bombing it is trying to destroy this state that is there and it is going to be a very hard thing to do... Accept reality, accept that state but try to get better rulers for it, not ISIS."

The West was never serious about fully supporting Syria's homegrown/independently raised anti-Assad rebel factions simply because they were deemed unreliable (i.e. they are not controlled by the West or its close allies). The whole agenda in Syria from day one has been about partitioning the nation and forming a new Western-backed Sunni state in its territory as a counterbalance to growing Shiite, Iranian and Russian power in the region. This task was trusted to Al Qaeda and ISIS, not the Syrian rebels. As I have been saying from day one: ISIS is the rabid dog they set loose in Iraq and SyriaNow that ISIS has managed to carve out a Sunni state between Damascus and Baghdad, it's time to slowly put the dog back into its cage and take control over the territory. Although I am not surprised, it is nevertheless very interesting that
 Professor Landis - who, allow me remind the reader, is "the top Syria scholar in the US" - suggests that Washington wants Turkey to act as the guarantor of the new Sunni state being formed in Syria by having Ankara put in place there a "good government" so that the US can thereafter "pour money into [its] development".

I have pointed all this out in previous blog commentaries, but I thought it would be better if the reader heard it right from the source. And regarding the source: It is noteworthy that the Pakistani native, Farid Zakaria is one of the Council for Foreign Relation's many high paid lapdogs working throughout the Anglo-America-Jewish world's news/propaganda outlets. Individuals like Joshua Landis, Farid Zakaria, Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, Christiane Amanpour, etc., are not journalists in the traditional sense, they cogs in the imperial war machine. Their task is to spread misinformation and deceit. I would go as far as saying, they are highly dangerous combatants.


Recent events involving Jordan is in my opinion an integral part of the final chapter in Syria. I do not think the Jordanian pilot was burned alive. I personally think the whole thing, like the beheadings of Westerners before it, was faked for psy-ops value. Even the timing of the announcement of the pilot's death, which came while Jordan's king was in Washington, was very suspicious. But whether the pilot died or not is really not the issue here for he may very well have been killed. What's important to understand here is that as with all ISIS acts, the purpose of his burning was to, again, "shock and awe" the public into compliance. There are carefully preparing their field of play. What's more poignant and revealing is the political reaction that came out of Amman and Washington to the alleged immolation. The spontaneous anti-ISIS protests in Amman (mostly by military age men) looked anything but spontaneous. The official Jordanian reaction felt very orchestrated. Jordan's American style war fever and the "tough" rhetoric coming out of Amman seems formulated to in fact appeal to Western sentiments. I mean stupid crap like this -
The king of Jordan sent out this badass photo in response to ISIS:http://finance.yahoo.com/news/photo-king-jordan-looking-badass-132100812.html
ISIS is the monster they created and the terrible carnage we are seeing in Syria and Iraq is the by-product of the Western world's imperial aspirations in the Middle East. The political West and their Jewish, Turkish, Saudi Arabian and Qatari friends are in fact responsible for the genocide of Yezdis, Christians and Alewites and a series of other crimes against humanity throughout Syria and Iraq. As they are dissecting the Iranian/Shiite Arc of influence in the region, they are also creating a north-south Sunni axis between Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Besides the Western world's obvious geostrategic factors, besides the Zionist factors at play, the region's all-important energy factor also plays prominently into all this. ISIS was therefore meant to "shock and awe" the sheeple into backing an eventual ground invasion of Syria by Western or Western-backed forces. Their geostrategic agenda is to create a swath of Western-Saudi backed Sunni state between Damascus and Baghdad. Since the beginning of the Syrian civil war, Jordan, along with Turkey, was a strategic staging area for the anti-Assad war effort.

With Erdogan's increasingly belligerent behavior not to mention his self-serving neo-Ottoman fantasies pissing-off policymakers in Washington and Tel Aviv, it now seems as if the Anglo-Arab king of Jordan has been chosen the lead the Sunni war effort in Syria. If it all pans out, I think we will eventually see an invasion of regions in Syria that are currently occupied by ISIS by Western-backed Arab forces. It should also be mentioned that all this may be coordinated with Assad's government. I suspect that a final deal has been reached or is in the process of being reached with Bashar Assad. I think Syria's final partition has been decided by all powers involved in the civil war, including Russia and Iran. I think that in time a new Western-backed Sunni state will be created within the former territories of Syria and Iraq.


Ultimately, the four year old Syrian tragedy will prove to be a stalemate. There will not be any clear winners. Western/Israeli/Saudi/Turkish interests were not able to defeat Shiite-backed Alewites and the Hezbollah; Shiite-Alewite interests were not able to create a continuous link from Lebanon to Iran. With that said, going forward, Turkey and Israel will be the wild cards in the geopolitical formulation process. Ankara still wants a final say in how Syria will look after the war ends. Ankara still wants leverage over Iraqi Kurds. Israel, for its part, still wants to see Hezbollah defeated or disarmed and it still wants to stop Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons capability. Therefore, Turkish and Israeli actions will remain unpredictable. Israeli belligerence and nonconformity is already being felt in Washington.

New year assault against Armenia

The new year started off with a series of major assaults against the Armenian state: A rapid escalation of violence along Armenia's border with Azerbaijan has brought the nation to a near war-like situation; a Russian soldier inexplicably murdered an entire family of seven in the Armenian city of Gyumri causing serious tensions between Moscow and Yerevan; an extremist group known as Founding Parliament has increased the intensity of its effort to incite a revolution in Armenia and has more recently attempted to embroil Artsakh as well; Armenia's ruling political party had an unexpected but a serious falling out with the nation's second most powerful political party; and Victoria "Fuck the EU" Nuland and was just recently in Armenia to give out cookies.

Is a Maidan being planned for Armenia this year? I personally think so, and I am not the only one. Former Ronald Reagan official also thinks so. Please see the following interview with Paul Craig Roberts translated into Armenian and Russian -

Փոլ Քրեյգ Ռոբերթս. Նրանք փորձելու են ոչնչացնել ավանդական բարոյականությունը:http://hanun.am/?p=678
Пол Крейг Робертс. Армении грозит опасность:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMysv6HCOyg&list=PLjsU_nUEJwGbfmxdH-tVDnl23BI1ln4BT#t=28
Too many potentially explosive incidents are taking place almost simultaneously. These things don't happen by chance, especially not in a place like the south Caucasus. This is a multi-pronged assault against the Armenian state. There are dark forces trying to sabotage Armenia's Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) membership by attempting to drive a wedge between Yerevan and Moscow. There are dark forces trying to drive a wedge between Armenia and Artsakh. There are dark forces trying to incite a Ukraine-like uprising in Armenia. There are dark forces trying to divert Armenian attention from the commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide. They successfully set fires to Syria and Ukraine. Predictably, it's Armenia's turn. Armenians are looked upon as a gullible, restless and easily manipulated sheeple. A Ukraine-style uprising is definitely in the works for Armenia. But, will it succeed?

I personally do not think so. That proverbial train left the station many years ago. Although we Armenians have more than our share of easily manipulated idiots who are more than willing to destroy their homeland in their blind pursuit of Western fairytales, Western-sponsored color revolutions have not been able to find fertile ground in Armenia. The Armenian on the street instinctually understands the paramount importance of Armenia's alliance with Russia. Despite Yerevan's flirtations with the West, the country's powerful "Karabakh clan" remains staunchly pro-Russian. Moreover, Armenia's Russian-backed security services are very capable and perform their tasks very efficiently. Armenia is bound to have sociopolitical unrest and periodic strife, but a major revolution is all but ruled out.

The first such attempt by Levon Petrosian and his gang in 2008 failed miserably. The second such attempt by Raffi Hovanissian in 2013 was also a total failure. They are now placing hope on a new breed of activists - very small in number but very vocal and extremist in demeanor - to push forward their agenda in the country. Founding Parliament (formerly known as Pre-Parliament) extremists seem to have been tasked with spearheading the internal assault against Armenia's statehood. As outrageous as it may sound, Founding Parliament extremists are promising to raise a civilian militia and topplethe ruling "regime" by the centennial of the Armenian Genocide. This irrationality and destructive behavior is essentially the by-product of Western funding. We see Founding Parliament extremists trying to do in Armenia what was and is currently being done in places such as Venezuela, Serbia, Libya, Egypt, Syria and Ukraine. They are exploiting the country's growing pains and Yerevan's incompetence (i.e. appeasement towards Western powers) in an attempt to sow sociopolitical unrest in the country. After a few failed attempts to capture the public's attention, Founding Parliament extremists finally managed to make headlines on January, 31 when they took their traveling circus to Artsakh -
«Ռեյդային ստուգումներ» Արցախում: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbF33yx8jpo
In a nutshell, Founding Parliament gathered a large convoy of motor vehicles and traveled to Artsakh in an attempt to recruit activists in the area for their planned revolution, of course set to take place on the one hundred anniversary of the Armenian Genocide on April 24, 2015. Their operation did not get far. Once at the border with Artsakh, they got a nasty surprise from the authorities.

These people are truly a strange gaggle of weirdos and Western mercenaries. Although they love to be called Armenian patriots, their extremist political agenda is glaringly and dangerously anti-Armenian in nature. How patriotic is it to topple the Armenian government by the use of arms, especially at a time like this? How intelligent is it to attempt to severe Armenia's ties with Russia, especially at a time like this? How patriotic or intelligent is it to try to do all this on the centennial of the Armenian Genocide?!The only agenda Founding Parliament freaks are pushing forward in Armenia are the ones formulated in Washington and Ankara. These fatalistic freaks may be patriots, but they are not Armenian patriots.  These extremist freaks seem hellbent on having Armenians repeat the fatal mistakes of Georgians and Ukrainians for their financial masters in the West.

In fact, their previous name - Pre-Parliament - and political methodology actually reminds me of the Bolshevik movement's early beginnings. 

Over one hundred years ago, Western/Jewish funded Marxist activists operating out of Germany, Britain, France and the US began traveling to the Russian Empire to spread their ideological "enlightenment". These activists who would later become known as Bolsheviks would travel from village to village, from town to town to spread what essentially was the time period's Western values (fairytales about equality, land reform, workers rights, atheism, international brotherhood, etc). The geopolitical goal of their agenda, however, was to strike a fatal blow to the already weakened Russian Empire. The poor living conditions of the peasantry throughout the region was the opportunity they exploited. The bait used was promises of justice, land rights and better working and living conditions. A bright future was promised to all - if only the Russian Czar could be toppled. It was these Western funded extremists with utopian slogans that managed to rise to prominence in the chaotic backdrop of the First World War. It was these champions of the downtrodden and the working class that become some of history's most bloodthirsty murderers. It was these advocates of the common man that were ultimately responsible for the deaths of many millions of people. It was these champions of atheism and "international brotherhood" that created conditions that allowed the genocide of Ottoman Armenians to take place. Today, Bolsheviks are back, but this time under the guise of Globalism, Westernization, Liberalism and Democracy. And just like yesterday, today's Bolsheviks are once again funded by Western Jews and they are once more collaborating with Western imperialists. We see their ilk throughout Armenia's ideologically empty and morally bankrupt political opposition. The following link is to an Azeri news article about one of Armenia's typical opposition characters -
Famous Armenian journalist apologizes for Khojaly:http://www.news.az/articles/karabakh/96015
They probably do not realize it, but in spirit and demeanor, Founding Parliament is the reincarnation of Bolshevik extremists. They probably do not realize it, but Founding Parliament is pushing forward a Turco-Western agenda in Armenia. They probably do not realize it, but Founding Parliament extremists are the West's cannon-fodder. Eventually, one of the group's activists may even get assassinated by their Western handlers as a provocation against Yerevan. Taking into consideration the assassination attempt on Paruyr Hayrikian a couple of years ago and the recent successful assassination of Boris Nemtsov, trust me, this is not a farfetched theory. People like Hayrikian and Nemtsov are more valuable to their Western masters dead than alive. Nevertheless, Founding Parliament's latest political stunt is particularly alarming because this is the first time any political opposition group has made a direct play on Artsakh. Although Levon Petrosian's gang was responsible for first sowing anti-Karabakhtsi sentiments in Armenian society, Founding Parliament has become the first to physically pull Artsakh in the muck-and-mire of their political agenda. 

Regarding what happened on January 31: Founding Parliament extremists should not have tried to draw Artsakh into their Neo-Bolshevik nonsense, especially at a time like this when the region is in a virtual state of war. Founding Parliament extremists should not have taken their women and children with them, especially after they were told that their activities were not wanted in Artsakh. With that said, however, I also think that Artsakh police may have somewhat overreacted. I know it's the south Caucasus. I understand we are talking about Armenians. But the region's law enforcement bodies could have acted more professional by setting up a roadblock to stop Founding Parliament's traveling circus. They could have then ordered Founding Parliament's traveling circus to return back to Armenia. Founding Parliament clowns that did not obey orders could have been arrested. Founding Parliament clowns that attempted to resist arrest could have then - and only then - been roughed up. In situations like this, when there are no laws being flagrantly broken, I do not condone police violence. This did not have to happen this way. The only winners in this incident were the Turks and Azeris watching from the sidelines. With that said, I primarily blame incompetent politicians in Yerevan - and their "complimentary politics" which has allowed Western activists in Armenia a free hand - for allowing things to get out of control like this. With that said, I willnot place any blame on Artsakh authorities for anything simply because the territory is in a state of war and this is not time for Founding Parliament's nonsense. It was Yerevan's job to stop the motorcade from reaching Artsakh.

One last thing: Jirayr Sefilian's time in Armenia has long expired. What gives the people the stupid idea that just because someone is good on the battlefield will be good as a politician? If Sefilian truly wanted to contribute to Armenia's security and development, he should have remained within the ranks of the military instead of surrounding himself with dubious characters such as Igor Muradyan and Gegham Julfajyan. Jirayr Sefilian is no longer serving Armenian interests. In fact, he hasn't done so in twenty years. As a Middle Eastern Armenian of Cilician decent, I call on Armenian officials to hang a shiny medal around Sefilian's neck, thank him for his service to the motherland twenty years ago, then politely place him, his wife and his child on the very next flight to Beirut and say bye-bye. 


The arm wrestler that wanted to be king

What Armenia's needs is a sociopolitical evolution, not a Western-sponsored revolution.With the region reaching a boiling point, this is the time to rally around the Armenian state.This is not the time and the south Caucasus is not the place for Western inspired sociopolitical experiments in ArmeniaThis is not the time for bicker over petty domestic matters. This is not the time for power plays on the Armenian throne. But if that's what Western interests want, Armenia's self-destructive peasantry will make sure that is what they will get. Enter the arm wrestler that wanted to be king.

In a quintessential Armenian version of the Game of Thrones, Gagik Tsarukyan (aka Dodi Gago), the arm wrestler/sex offender turned billionaire businessman recently made a serious attempt on the Armenian presidential seat. Prior to this, Tsarukyan's political party, Prosperous Armenia (Arm: Բարգավաճ Հայաստան կուսակցություն) had what could only be described as an interesting relationship with the country's ruling party, the Republicans (Arm: Հայաստանի Հանրապետական Կուսակցություն). At times Tsarukyan's political party looked as if it's playing the role of a controlled opposition (i.e. collaborating with the ruling administration), at other times it looked as if it was making a serious play on power. I do not know how sincere Tsarukyan's most recent attempt was but this was not the first time he made an attempt on the Armenian throne.
 
Back in 2007, Tsarukyan was also a contender in the presidential race in Armenia. As with all political competitions, he soon began badmouthing his main presidential rival, Serj Sargsyan. However, Tsarukyan didn't stop merely there, he went a step further in his rhetoric. He began talking negatively about Armenia's relationship with Russia. On April 12, 2007 it was reported that two small bombs exploded in two of Tsarukyan's political offices. Not much else was said about the extraordinary incident by the news press in Armenia. The following inconspicuous commentary about the incidents in question was written by the British agent/rights activist, Onnik Krikorian -



Merely days after the incident, it was said that Tsarukyan had taken a previously unplanned trip to Moscow. Nothing was said about why he went or with whom he met while he was there. However, after Tsarukyan returned to Armenia from his short stay in Moscow, he seemed to be a new man. He quietly dropped out of the presidential race and began complimenting Armenia's relationship with Russia. In an interview with a Russian news agency on April 18, 2007, Tsarukyan commented that - "we will develop 90 percent of our relations with Russia and 10 percent with Europe and others" -

Gagik Tsarukyan’s interview to Russian O2TV:http://ditord.com/2007/04/18/gagik-tsarukyans-interview-to-russian-o2tv/
In 2011, Tsarukyan's political party was back in the presidential race. With American agent Vartan Oskanyan at his side back then, Tsarukyan seemed to have secured Western support. But, being the shrewd businessman that he is, he was not about to risk the destruction of any more of his political offices. He therefore was smart enough to seek President Putin's blessing as well. His efforts ultimately proved futile.

Fast forward to today: For reasons that can as of now only be explained by speculation, Tsarukyan just made his third and by-far the most blatant attempt on the presidential seat in Armenia. Was Tsarukyan recruited into the Western agenda to topple the Armenian government? Time will tell. But Tsarukyan's second largest political party in Armenia brought the country to the brink of a major political crisis. A disaster, however, was averted at the last minute. Similar to what had happened in the past, Tsarukyan seems to have been summoned to Moscow and set straight. After bringing the country to the brink of yet another political disaster, Tsarukyan proved smart enough or was frightened enough to once more take a step back -
This latest Tsarukyan retreat seems to have been the last straw for Vartan Oskanian. I guess it's time for Uncle Sam's parasites in Armenia to look for another accommodating host. Incidentally, after Raffi Hovanissian's failed attempt on the Armenian throne, he also traveled to Moscow to have "several good meetings" with Russian officials. Levon Petrosian is also said to have done the same during his failed attempts on the Armenian throne. Nevertheless, the recent spat between Tsarukyan's political party and the Republican party is a symbol of how low modern Armenian civilization has fallen. These characters, these tactless chobans-in-Armani-suites and Western mercenaries are unfortunately an accurate reflection of the nature of the modern Armenian. With that said, however, it should also be said that the current leadership headed by President Sargsyan is by-far the lesser of all evils currently waiting on the political sidelines in Yerevan to take advantage of any sociopolitical unrest. It is the realization that those waiting on the political sidelines of Yerevan are those who serve Western/Turkish agenda in Armenia is the reason why I remain a reluctant supporter of the "regime".

How I wish or Armenians to put aside their arrogance, jealousy, selfishness and political illiteracy and begin understanding and appreciating what it means to have a state. Our people's shortsightedness, self-righteousness and political ignorance is becoming a serious problem for our homeland. The aforementioned problem that we suffer from is a pan-national one. In other words, the Armenian Diaspora, particularly the Western Diaspora, is not immune to shortsightedness and political illiteracy. 

Dubious voices warning about Russian betrayals

Russian-Armenian relations has historically been based on very firm geostrategic foundations. This is why those who try to cast a dark shadow on Yerevan's alliance with Moscow only manage to make themselves look stupid. But try, they do. With political tensions in Armenia rising to new heights, there are dubious voices once more warning Armenians about Russian "betrayals" -
Sleeping with Our Enemy: Russia Sells Weapons to Azerbaijan:http://hetq.am/eng/news/58661/sleeping-with-our-enemy-russia-sells-weapons-to-azerbaijan.html
Once again, like hyenas sensing a weakened pray, Russophobes are attempting to exploit flaws within Armenia's relationship with Russia. Once again, people who normally spend their free time wondering about what blackman will Kim Kardashian be sleeping with next are trying to engage in "political analysis". The author or of the above article wants American-Armenians to believe that Russia is "betraying" Armenia - at a time when higher powers are trying to drive a wedge between Yerevan and Moscow, at a time when Armenia desperately needs Russian support for survival. How smart or responsible is that? Had the stakes not be so high, I would normally ignore our idiots. But the stakes are such that any wrong step by Yerevan may prove fatal for the Armenian state. My humble suggestion for American-Armenians is to mind their own damn business... which is to worry about their comatose, near-dead community that has turned into a dangerous catalyst for Western political agendas inside Armenia.The above article, however, gives me an opportunity to further address this topic once more.

Those who seek to drive a wedge between Russia and Armenia have developed what can be described as three silly slogans: "Czarist Russia wanted Armenia without Armenians", "Russians gave Armenian lands to Turks" and "Russia betrays Armenia by selling weapons to Azerbaijan". It does not matter whether those who disseminate such dark fairytales do so consciously or subconsciously. What matters is that what they do is psy-ops who's purpose is to make a play on the sentiments and emotions of the easily manipulated sheeple. In other words, the intent is to subtly and systematically sow anti-Russian sentiments within Armenian society.

The first slogan about Czarist Russia (essentially a Dashnaktsakan fairytale from a time period when Armenian revolutionaries were foolishly rebelling against a government that was actually supporting their struggle in the Ottoman Empire) is too ridiculous to respond to other than by simply stating: It's precisely because of Czarist Russia that an Armenia came into existence, it's precisely because of a Czarist Russia that Armenian nationalism came into existence. None of our deaf, dumb and blind Russophobes are capable of naming one actual thing that Russians, as a nation, have deliberately done against Armenians.Historically, not a single square millimeter of Armenian territory has ever been gifted to Turks by Russians. The party guilty of relinquishing Armenian territories to Turks and Azeris was theWestern/Jewish led and financed Bolshevik government that had come to power in 1917 by destroying the Russian Empire from within. Bolsheviks represented Russia at the time as much as ISIS represents Syria today. Bolshevism was in fact much more destructive to Russia than to Armenia. Bolshevism through the 1920s was almost exclusively a none-Russian political system. Therefore, blaming Russians for the evils of Bolshevism is like blaming the murder victim for the actions of the murderer. Those to hang Bolshevik crimes on Russian necks are either imbeciles or agents of the Anglo-American-Jewish political order.  

Armenia lives today as a nation-state in the south Caucasus largely thanks to the geopolitical factor created by Russia's presence in the region during the past two hundred years. Had Russia not come down to the south Caucasus in the early 19th century - and stayed - all of us, including our Russophobes and proud nationalists, would still be herding goats or making donkey saddles somewhere in eastern Turkey or northern Iran.

Regarding Russian arms to Baku: There is something Armenians generally speaking have a very-very hard time understanding and it's called realpolitik. It does not matter how wealthy or how educated an Armenian is, when it comes to political matters, Armenians act like troubled children. I personally think this is a serious matter that has its roots in genetics (i.e. breeding). An Armenian can be brilliant in science, medicine, literature, art, business, sports, etc. But when it comes to politics, the Armenian is a self-destructive peasant regardless of his or her social status. That's why it's common in Armenian circles now to hear nonsense like - "If they are our friends who do they sell weapons to our enemies?!" Shouldn't children be asking stupid questions like this? Political ignorance and the lack of rational/objective thought in politics is so pervasive in Armenian society that there is actually a word for describing politically ignorant Armenians engaging in political analysis: It's calledկոշկակարների քաղաքականութիւն. Roughly translated into English it means the political reasoning of tradesmen. In other words: Idiots trying to make sense of stuff that is well above their heads. And its not only Armenians. Sensing opportunity, like the smut-peddlers that they are, Western financed propaganda agencies are also enthusiastically exploiting the matter of Russian arms sales to Azerbaijan by making a play on Armenian sentiments -
Armenia: With Friends Like Russia, Who Needs Enemie:http://www.eurasianet.org/node/72616
So, once more, allow me to explain Russian weapons sales to Azerbaijan:

While we all know that Russia and Armenia are locked in a genuine strategic alliance, we must also realize that Russia is doing its best to also lure Baku into its political orbit. This is somewhat similar to how Washington tries to keep its influence over Turks and Greeks and Israelis and Arabs by selling the conflicted parties US made weaponry. With that said, Russian officials realize that they do not allow the sale of Russian weaponry to Baku there are nations like US, Britain, Ukraine, Belarus, China, Pakistan, Turkey and Israel that would. So, from a Russian perspective, why not make money at the same time create leverage over Baku? At the end of the day, does it really matter where the weaponry Azerbaijan uses are made? Does it really matter where the bullet that killed a young Armenian soldier was made? No, it does not. The bullet or bomb are not the problem. The problem is how such weapons are used by governments. Azeris have the luxury - the petrodollars - to purchase whatever they want from whomever they want. We Armenians on the  other hand don't have the money for modern arms, we are therefore being given by Russia whatever arms we need to counter Azeri aggression. Can our Russophobic idiots at least say thank you? We also know that Armenia has a tiny military (so tiny that yearly recruitment quotas aren't even being met). By covering the entire length of Armenia's vulnerable border with Turkey, Russia is giving Armenia the ability to concentrate its meager resources on its more manageable border with Azerbaijan.Can our Russophobic idiots at least say thank you?

The reality that is somehow escaping most Armenians today is this: Even in ideal circumstances, Armenia would NOT be able to defend its borders against Turks and Azeris without massive assistance from Russia. Moreover, there is another political angle to Russian arms to Baku: By supplying arms to Baku andYerevan, Moscow is making sure to keep Azerbaijan and Armenia dependent on Russia. This is expected. This is logical. As we have seen recently, Russia's diplomatic abilities and statecraft are second-to-none. Of course they will exploit the situation. Russians also know that starving Armenians are easily bought. Russians know well that Armenia's political scene is saturated by Western mercenaries. Russians also know that Armenia is allied to Russia today primarily because of the "Karabakh clan" in Yerevan. Russians are also upset that Yerevan is stubbornly continuing its counterproductive flirtations with EU, NATO and Washington. So, ask yourselves: Why should Russia trust Armenians? Well, is there trust in politics to begin with? Therefore, Russian arms to Baku is also a way for Moscow to put pressure on a Yerevan that has been oscillating between East and West for the past twenty-five years.

It should also be pointed out that Moscow is very serious about maintaining direct control over the situating in Artsakh because of the great geostrategic value Artsakh (similar to Abkhazia and South Ossetia)brings to the political table. As we saw back in 1999, the current status quo in Artsakh is something Moscow will maintain at all costs - even if that means spilling blood. And I am glad it has, because I have little doubt that had it been up to us Armenians, official Yerevan would most probably have adopted the infamous Goble Plan sometime back around 1999 and Armenia today would have been either laid waste by Russians or have become subordinate to Turkey, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Western oil interests.

At the end of the day, there is no trust or unconditional friendships in politics. At the end of the day, arms supply to Baku or not, Armenia lives as a result of the Russian factor in the south Caucasus. No Russia in Armenia = no Armenia in the south Caucasus. So, instead of wasting time spreading Russophobia in Armenian cyberspace, concerned Armenians in positions of influence would do better to lobby Armenian interests with Russian officials.

For the record, US and British governments train Azeri snipers (yes, those that kill dozens of Armenian soldiers annually) and Israel and Turkey provide Baku with a lot of military training, technical assistance and billions of dollars in sophisticated weaponry. Here are some facts to consider: 
American military contractors MPRI Inc is training Azeri marksmen:http://www.militaryindustrialcomplex.com/contract_detail.asp?contract_id=81
US Naval Special Ops Demos Training in Azerbaijan:http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=26294

The Sunday Times: British special forces carried out secret trainings in Azerbaijan: http://www.panorama.am/en/society/2013/10/21/sunday-times/

Azerbaijan Makes Massive Israeli Weapons: http://www.eurasianet.org/node/65053

Is a US-Financed Azeri Satellite A Threat to Armenia’s Security?:http://asbarez.com/94756/is-a-us-financed-azeri-satellite-a-threat-to-armenia%E2%80%99s-security/

There is yet another twist to this matter. This is not 1991. If there is a war with Azerbaijan, the Armenian military will face on the battlefield a well prepared and bigger enemy force with large amounts of modern weaponry. If Armenia is to face modern weaponry on the battlefield, I rather it be weapons systems that the Armenian military is keenly familiar with and thus capable of defeating in combat. Here we see a Russian expert voicing similar sentiments for an Armenian audience -
Russian expert: Armenia should be interested in Russian-Azeri arms deals:http://www.arminfo.am
Russians are helping a tiny, remote, landlocked, blockaded and impoverished nation protect itself from predators like Turkey and Azerbaijan. Despite what our people's massive ego and deep-seated political illiteracy makes them want to believe, we Armenians CANNOT sustain a state in the south Caucasus without Russian support.

So, once more: By securing Armenia's border with Turkey, Russia is allowing Armenia to concentrate its meager resources on a more manageable enemy, Azerbaijan. Baku has the petrodollars to purchase whatever it wants, from whoever it wants. To create military parity between Armenians and Azeris, Russia is providing Armenia modern weaponry essentially for free. Moreover, Russia's 102nd military base is the single most important military factor in the south Caucasus for it is a deterrence against Turks and NATO. The 102nd base was created with a duel role: Project Russian power in the region and protect Armenia from invasion. When was the last time our "patriotic" Armenians said "thank you Mother Russia for helping us keep up with Azeri arms purchases"?

Anyone that tries to blame Russians for the crimes of Bolsheviks is an intellectual midget. Anyone that tries to spread Russophobia in Armenian society is a traitor to Armenia. I don't care if they do it knowingly or unknowingly, what they are doing is extremely dangerous to Armenia. One must be deaf, dumb and/or blind not to see this. We saw where this kind of Russophobic nonsense got Georgia and Ukraine. How stupid. how treasonous must one be to do the same? I think American-Armenians like David Boyajian should mind their own business and leave politics to Armenian officials in Yerevan and Stepanakert. At the end of the day, if one day Russians decided to betray Armenia, none of our big talking patriots are capable of stopping them. So, instead of talking nonsense I suggest our nationalist nutjobs pray that it does not happen. Actually, along with praying I also suggest working on bettering Russian-Armenian relations so that it does not happen.

I am willing to admit that Russian arms sales to Azerbaijan (specifically, the delivery of weapons systems such as theSmerch) is one of the flaws found in Russo-Armenian relations today. In my opinion, flaws that exist in the relationship is a direct consequence of Yerevan's flirtations with the West as well as the absence of Armenian lobbying activities in Moscow. With that said, I say it's a flaw merely because of the way it's perceived (i.e. the negative psychological effect it has on Armenian society). Nevertheless, it is not a grave threat to Armenia because Russian arms sales to Baku is not directed against Armenia. In fact, upon close examination ofrecent purchases Baku has made one sees that the bulk of it's Russian purchases are for Azerbaijan's air and naval defenses, one also finds quite a bit of Western and Israeli weaponry in Azerbaijan's arsenal. More importantly, for every weapons system Russia sells to Baku it gives Armenia a weapons system that can counter it on the battlefield. As such, Moscow is maintaining the balance of power between Yerevan and Baku, as it makes sure to keep control over both Yerevan and Baku. At the end of the day, the big bad Russian Bear is Armenia’s one and only ally, and thank God for that because without Russia, all of the south Caucasus has the potential to be overrun by Turks and Muslims.

The two centuries old friendship between Russians and Armenians have passed the test of time. Yes, there are flaws, as there are flaws in any relationship. But instead of fear-mongering about Russia (which is becoming a pass time in Armenian society), Armenians should embark on a pan-national effort to fix the existing flaws between Moscow and Yerevan.

Anyone that tries to blame Russians for the crimes of Bolsheviks is an intellectual midget. Anyone that tries to spread Russophobia in Armenian society is a traitor to Armenia. I don't care if they do it knowingly or unknowingly, what they are doing is extremely dangerous to Armenia. One must be deaf, dumb and/or blind not to see this because we saw where this kind of Russophobic nonsense got Georgia and Ukraine. How stupid, how treasonous must one be to do the same? I think American-Armenians like David Boyajianshould mind their own business and leave politics to Armenian officials in Yerevan and Stepanakert. At the end of the day, if one day Russians decided to betray Armenia, none of our big talking patriots are capable of stopping them. So, instead of talking nonsense I suggest our nationalist nutjobs pray that it does not happen. Actually, along with praying I also suggest working on bettering Russian-Armenian relations so that it does not happen.

My message to our "nationalists" and Russophobes


The problem with your intellectually bankrupt kind (and I know your kind very well) is that you simply don't know how to be critical in a constructive sense. You are Armenian after all. So, I understand, but that does not mean I will tolerate your nonsense. You foolishly think that simply by "uniting" Armenia and defeat its enemies. You foolishly think that by not being dependent on Russia, Armenia will gain independence. You discuss various political matters without ever putting the subject matter into a proper historical and geopolitical context. More often than not your facts are half-truths. Sometimes your facts are lies that were passed down to you by your grandparents. Your perception, your understanding of the world and yourself is twisted. Your reality is warped beyond recognition. Your kind was until very recently very pro-Western. It had to take the bloody tragedies in Libya, Syria, Iraq and Ukraine to wake you up from your American dream. Despite what you now know about the political West, your kind continues to spread within Armenian society a dangerous toxin know as Russophobia. Therefore, forgive me if I don't trust any of you when it comes to Armenia. In fact, I don't care if you see yourselves as an Armenian patriot. For me you are worst than a Turk because you are a dangerous cancer within the Armenian body that is easily manipulated by Armenia's enemies.

If God forbid the Russopbobia that comes to you so naturally ever goes mainstream in Armenia, our country will disappear from the map once more. Before you talk your nonsense, just take a moment to look at the bigger picture. Perhaps you'll begin realizing that if Russians somehow turned against Armenia someday, not even a million of our "fedayees" would be able to save the country from its inevitable fate. So, I suggest you pray it doesn't happen. Actually, along with praying, I also suggest you work towards making sure it doesn't happen. In other words, put a rest to your Cold War ghosts, curb your ego, put aside you petty nonsense and try to lobby Armenian causes amongst Russians. And if there is something that you don't like about Russian-Armenian relations, voice it in a constructive manner. In other words, do not sow panic in Armenian society with nonsense about Russians betraying Armenians, or Russia wanting Armenia without Armenians, or Russia giving away Armenian lands to Turks... 

At the end of the day, Armenia lives today because of Russia. Armenia's independence from Russia will only result in Armenian dependence on Turkey. In other words, no Russia in Armenia means no Armenia in the south Caucasus. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to realize any of this, but you do have to have a clear mind. Sadly, most Armenians today are too engulfed in their petty world and too distracted by their massive arrogance to see things clearly. The more I observe Armenians the more I become convinced that Armenians are simply incapable of seeing what's truly in the long-term interests of Armenia.

Our nationalist nutjobs today remind me of the cat that looked in the mirror and saw a lion. God forbid this delusional Cat (i.e. the Armenia that exists in the minds of our nationalists) ever goes out to play in the real world where hungry Wolves roam. God forbid this Cat goes out into an ecosystem where the Bear has not driven away the Wolves. Our nationalist nutjobs seriously need to stop their foolish "fedayee" nonsense before it kills our country. That "fedayee" stuff works only against backward peasants (like the Azeris in the early 1990s). That "fedayee" stuff works only when there is a major power in the background supporting it. The geopolitical circumstances of the region within which Armenia unfortunately finds itself in dictates that we Armenians will be subordinate to Russia for the foreseeable future. There are no real alternatives to this.

With Armenia fully within the Russian orbit, we can all expect Western powers to make a direct play on Armenian nationalism once more. The West successfully used Armenian nationalism in Diasporan circles to sow disunity amongst Armenians during Soviet period. The West's agenda to support Armenian nationalists, however, dissipated when the Soviet Union collapsed and nationalism became a problem for the West. The West therefore concentrated on supporting liberal, globalist ideals in the post-Soviet years. Now, however, that the Russian Bear is back and Western powers have in response turned various regions into a volatile powder keg, we can all expect them to once more begin exploiting Armenian nationalism to once again sow discord between Diasporan Armenians and their Armenian homeland. Sadly, Western powers will find a fertile ground to sow their seeds amongst nationalists because nationalism, especially Armenian nationalism, has a tendency to be extremely shortsighted, emotional, irrational and uncompromising. 

Armenians desperately need politically awareness and a type of nationalism that rational, farsighted, pragmatic and pro-Russian. Similar to Armenian-Persian relations in the ancient world, Armenians need to begin seeing Armenia and Russia as two segments of one civilization. Accordingly, Armenians need to apply their positive traits (ingenuity, creativity, resilience, perseverance, hard work, etc) towards fully extracting the potentials of Russia's alliance with Armenia. At the very least, we need to be happy that a neighboring superpower looks at our Armenia as a great geostrategic asset and not a nuisance. After all, Russia is the only nation on earth that will be adversely impacted if Armenia disappears. This has a great geostrategic significance to Armenia. So, instead of complaining like old women (which is what our nationalist nutjobs and Russophobes do), we need to figure out a way to better lobby Armenian matters within the walls of the Kremlin.

Why is it that Armenians admire Jews for their political agility but when the opportunity comes for Armenians to act like Jews, Armenians instead act like Arabs? This Arabesque behavior of Armenians may be why Washingtonian reptiles are keeping hope alive in Yerevan.

Bad omen for Armenia

After seeing what we have been seeing in places such as Venezuela, Serbia, Greece, Ukraine, Libya, Egypt, Syria and Iraq in recent years, I still find it rather amazing that there are significant numbers of Armenians today that have somehow convinced themselves that Armenia needs a revolution and that Armenia can do without Russian protection because the "civilized world" (i.e. the political West) will provide for and protect Armenia in times of need. Haven't these idiots learned anything from our history? Haven't these idiots learned anything from recent world events? Haven't these idiots seen the "civilized world" destroy nations and kill millions around the world? Haven't these idiots realized that for centuries Western powers have been in bed with Turks? I suggest we don't repeat the mistakes of our forefathers. We have already lost so much because of our political illiteracy. I think one genocide is enough. There is a time and place for everything. Armenia is surrounded by predators in the south Caucasus. The Caucasus region is one bad event away from exploding. This is therefore not the time and the south Caucasus is not the place for a revolution or for Russophobia. This is the time to strengthen Armenia's ties with the Russian Federation. This is the time to begin strengthening Armenia economically by looking north, south and east. This is the time to rally around the Armenian state regardless of who is currently at the helm in Yerevan. 


Nevertheless, the troubling realization that there are voices in Armenian society demanding a "regime change" (on the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide of all times) and the expulsion of the Russian military from Armenia (at a time when that region of the world is on the verge of a major calamity) reveals just how suicidal, how treasonous, how self-destructive and how politically illiterate many Armenians can be.  And just when things couldn't get worst... 


Victoria "Fuck the EU" Nuland (the wife of neocon zealot Robert Kagan) was in Armenia recently to essentially give out cookies to gullible Armenians, similar to what she did in Kiev a little over a year ago just before that country fell into utter ruin. The cookie in Armenia's case, however, was her visit to the memorial complex of a genocide that she and her government refuses to officially recognize. There were other cookies as well. Similar to what Clinton did during her visits to Armenia on 2010 and 2012it was also quite expected that Nuland would also meet with some of Uncle Sam's servants in the country.Nuland's imperial delegation also seems to have conveyed the message to Yerevan that the empire is pleased with it. According to various reports put out recently, Washington seems particularly pleased with the progress of "democracy", "freedom of press", "civil society" and "economic reform" in Armenia -
All in all, this is a very bad omen for an Armenia that is already reeling from a series of internal and external assaults against it this year. That Washington is pleased with Armenia is something that should actually frighten the kaka out of Armenians. In an age where Western powers have weaponized everything imaginable, Armenians need to worry about the progress of "democracy" (i.e. providing the ignorant and easily manipulated masses a say in government); Armenians need to worry about the strengthening of "civil society" (i.e. tolerating dangerous subversive organizations funded by Western entities); Armenians need to worry about "reforming the economy" (i.e. keeping the financial system of Armenia subordinate to the US Dollar); and Armenians need to worry about "press freedoms" (i.e. allowing Western funded propaganda outlets posing as news agencies and Western funded "independent" journalists the freedom to sow Russophobia and foment sociopolitical unrest in Armenia).

It is truly troubling that democracy, civil society, human rights, freedom of the press and even humanitarian aid have become highly refined tools of manipulation and subversion in recent years. This is essentially because the hand that gives is always above the hand that receives. As long as nations look to the West for guidance or assistance, the West will look to manipulate. The Armenian pursuit of Western fairytales and Yerevan's burning desire for Western financial aid is therefore what's keeping Armenia politically vulnerable to Western machinations. Armenia's flirtations with the West is also why Washington seems pleased with Armenia. In other words, Washington's desire to remain in the political game in Armenia is the reason for its current soft approach towards Yerevan -
NATO Official: Armenia’s Membership in EEU, CSTO ‘No Obstacle’ for NATO Relations: http://asbarez.com/130788/armenia%E2%80%99s-membership-in-eeu-csto-%E2%80%98no-obstacle%E2%80%99-for-nato-relations/

Being that Armenia is now officially a member of the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), Washington will do its best to exploit its assets throughout Armenian society to keep channels of communication and collaboration open with Yerevan. This was predicted. The south Caucasus remains strategically very important for the West essentially because it is the gateway to energy rich Central Asia. Yerevan's alliance with Moscow, the only one of its kind in the south Caucasus, has thus made Armenia a pivotal player because Washington knows that Moscow can essentially lose all of the south Caucasus if Yerevan is somehow made to change course and seek an alliance with the West. Armenia is therefore a strategic prize not only for Moscow but also for the West.

Many Armenians realize that the West's ultimate geostrategic desire for the south Caucasus is to curb Russian and Iranian influence. Many Armenians realize that the West looks at the south Caucasus as a strategic corridor for the exploitation of Central Asian energy. Many Armenians realize that the West looks at Armenia as a strategic prize. Many Armenians are therefore making the mistake of thinking that Armenia can benefit from cooperating with Western powers. What many Armenians are failing to realize is that the West's agenda for the Caucasus runs the serious risk of creating a very dangerous political vacuum. If Russia (and/or Iran) suffers a defeat at the hands of Western powers, the only players that are already in the Caucasus region and ready to fill the vacuum are Western oil interests, Wahhabi Islamists and Turks. From an Armenian, Russian and Iranian perspective, this is the fundamental danger of the game Western powers are playing the Caucasus. Purely from an Armenian perspective, this is why the Western agenda for the region poses a threat that is existential in nature. This is the reason why Moscow, Yerevan and Tehran have formed an alliance of sorts in recent years. Simply put: Armenia's cooperation with Western powers cannot come at the expense of Russian interests in the south Caucasus because it is only the Russian factor in the region that's keeping Armenia alive. As I have said on many previous occasions: The Caucasus region has the natural tendency to revert back into being a Turkic/Islamic cesspool, and all that is required is one bad incident to make it happen.

I reiterate: For Russia, Armenia is a crucially important, natural ally in a highly volatile strategic region where anti-Russian sentiments run high. For the West, Armenia is a geopolitical prize to be won and essentially taken out of the political equation of the region. Russia is in the south Caucasus to protect its vulnerable southern borders from Turks, Wahhabi Islamists and Western interests. The West is in the south Caucasus to use Turks and Wahhabi Islamists to contain Russia and open an unhindered path for Western oil corporations. Armenia's friends, Russia and Iran, are the West's enemies. The West's friends, Turks and Wahhabi Islamists, are Armenia's enemies. The only country on earth that would be very adversely impacted if Armenia ceased to exist is Russia. Armenia's independence from Russia will only result in Armenia's dependence on Turkey. Therefore, no Russia in Armenia = no Armenia in the south Caucasus.

Anyone that cannot see what I am saying here simply does not understand geopolitics, does not know the Caucasus and has learned nothing about the region's history.

Ultimately, Washington will remain in the game in the Caucasus as long as Yerevan, Tbilisi and Baku continue to seek doing business with Western powers. Washington's destructive tug-of-war in the region will only end when Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan are firmly and securely placed within the Russian orbit and a new period of Pax Russicana begins. We still seem to be a long way from Pax Russicana. By having Victoria Nuland meeting rights groups and political activists in Yerevan, Washington is signaling to Yerevan that it expects such entities to be tolerated by Armenian authorities. It goes without saying that our chobans-in-Armani suites will happily give in to Washington's expectations just to look as if they are not too beholden to Moscow. Ultimately, our willingness to give into Western demands lies at the root of the sociopolitical problem in Yerevan because doing so provides Western powers a portal through with they will meddle, manipulate and exploit.

Let's stop fooling ourselves about Armenian capabilities or Armenian intelligence, we Armenians are awfully unprepared to safely sit at negotiation tables with masters of deceit and manipulation. Armenia is too weak and Armenians are too inexperienced to safely flirt with powers that have been cultivating their statecraft for centuries.

The finely crafted ability to meddle in a country's internal affairs is one of the ways with which Western powers always manage to stay in the game in targeted nations. At the end of the day, Washington's compliments about Armenia, as well as the Neocon war criminal's unwanted visit to the genocide memorial complex needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Essentially given the green light to operate by Armenian officials, US officials and CIA agents stationed in one of the largest US embassies in the world will continue working behind-the-scenes to foment sociopolitical unrest in the country. In fact, a headquarter meant to foment such unrest in "ex-Soviet countries" was just opened in Prague. In this context, "ex-Soviet countries" essentially means nations that are either allied to Russia (i.e. Armenia) or have the potential to be allied to Russia (i.e. Georgia). When it comes to inciting revolutions, the following center will be one of the seats of operation -
Czechs open center for civil society activists from ex-Soviet countries:https://ca.news.yahoo.com/czechs-open-center-civil-society-activists-ex-soviet-145849840.html
It is through such networks (and their enthusiastic activists from around the world) that Western powers can organize flash mob protests virtually at will: President Putin is visiting Armenia? No problem. Quickly get out a few thousand Armenian freaks in Yerevan to protest. President Orban is holding trade talks with Moscow? No problem. Quickly get out a few thousand Hungarian freaks to protest. President Zemen does not want to go along with sanctions against Russia? No problem. Quickly get out a few thousand Czech freaks toprotest. It's all meant to put pressure on a particular government and create a particular perception because for the sheeple - perception is reality! Like Marxists before them, they have an uncanny ability to appeal to the lowest or lowliest in social strata.

From Dictatorship to Democracy: Ideal Illusions 

Regardless of how beneficial or even necessary they may seem at first glance, any movement that has any form of Western-backing or is spearheaded by Western-led or inspired activists need to be categorically rejected. I say this because imperial interests in Washington have co-opted and weaponizedsociopolitical issues and are currently exploiting them towards self-serving political gains. Accepting help, in any form, from the political West comes with dangerous strings attached, conditions that developing nations such as Armenia or the Ukraine cannot meet. I ask you to refer to a book by James Peck regarding this very important topic for our era -
 
Ideal Illusions: How the U.S. Government Co-opted Human Rights

http://wondersofpakistan.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/storyimages_1300906851_war.jpg
"Devastating and deeply disturbing, this book lays bare any lingering illusions that human rights concerns seriously influence U.S. policy."—Andrew J. Bacevich, author of Washington Rules

The United States has long been hailed as a powerful force for global human rights. Now, drawing on thousands of documents from the CIA, the National Security Council, the Pentagon, and development agencies, James Peck shows in blunt detail how Washington has shaped human rights into a potent ideological weapon for purposes having little to do with rights—and everything to do with furthering America's global reach. Using the words of Washington's leaders when they are speaking among themselves, Peck tracks the rise of human rights from its dismissal in the cold war years as "fuzzy minded" to its calculated adoption, after the Vietnam War, as a rationale for American foreign engagement. He considers such milestones as the fight for Soviet dissidents, Tiananmen Square, and today's war on terror, exposing in the process how the human rights movement has too often failed to challenge Washington's strategies. A gripping and elegant work of analysis, Ideal Illusions argues that the movement must break free from Washington if it is to develop a truly uncompromising critique of power in all its forms.
Yes, many of the world's Hollywood-struck sheeple these days are indeed suffering from ideal illusions. These sheeple are the cannon-fodder Washington exploits against developing nations that not in their pockets or under their boots. Now, to place the enlightening book featured above into a better, more complete perspective, juxtaposed its message to the following book titled "From Dictatorship to Democracy".  Unlike the previous book's author, the following book was written by an American with a Western/Globalist political agenda. Unlike the previous book's intent, this work by Gene Sharp is essentially a step-by-step blueprint for revolution and its primary target (i.e. those it is trying to bait) are the freaks of society and the disgruntled masses  -
 
From Dictatorship to Democracy

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51ejQzJluRL._SL500_SS500_.jpg
From Dictatorship to Democracy was a pamphlet, printed and distributed by Dr Gene Sharp and based on his study, over a period of forty years, on non-violent methods of demonstration. Now in its fourth edition, it was originally handed out by the Albert Einstein Institution, and although never actively promoted, to date it has been translated into thirty-one languages. This astonishing book travelled as a photocopied pamphlet from Burma to Indonesia, Serbia and most recently Egypt, Tunisia and Syria, with dissent in China also reported. Surreptitiously handed out amongst youth uprisings the world over - how the 'how-to' guide came about and its role in the recent Arab uprisings is an extraordinary tale. Once read you'll find yourself urging others to read it and indeed want to gift it.
When Western financed civic society organizations gather their diverse operatives to form networks and workshops and make global connections during their annual meetings and conventions, these are the types of publications they disseminate and this is the kind of inspiration at work behind their activism. We must for once recognize that virtually every single societal matter found around the world today - be it Islamic militancy or gay rights or planned parenthood or nature protection - is ultimately being financed, controlled and/or exploited by Western imperial interests. As the first book by James Peck courageously suggests: Sociopolitical movements of the world today must first break free of Western control if they are to be safely embraced by developing societies. As the second book by Gene Sharp reveals, many of the democracy uprising we are seeing in various parts of the world get their funding and inspiration from Western sources. More perspective on this topic -
Does the US engineering revolutions?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpXbA6yZY-8 

Documents Leaked by WikiLeaks Show an Organization Training Opposition Around the World: http://revolution-news.com/documents-leaked-wikileaks-show-organization-trains-opposition-around-world/ 

How to Start a Revolution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO1t4Fif2c0 

Revolution Engineering: US know-how and 'colourful' technology:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0xlOeZ8Dr8&feature=plcp 
The Weight of Chains | Težina lanaca (2010): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waEYQ46gH08
NGOs, an extension of US foreign policy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-raqX4KKY1Q
Money Talks Through NGOs: http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-money-talks-through-ngos-1001010886
Washington on the War Path: Civil Society as Battering-Ram: http://rt.com/politics/washington-war-russia-putin-023/ 


George Soros and his open society: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncdisau7rBs

Czechs open center for civil society activists from ex-Soviet countries:https://ca.news.yahoo.com/czechs-open-center-civil-society-activists-ex-soviet-145849840.html
In 1969, British historian and aesthetician Sir Kenneth Clark stated: "It is lack of confidence, more than anything else, that kills a civilization. We can destroy ourselves by cynicism and disillusion, just as effectively as by bombs." In 2004, a Dutch paper called "The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism" claimed that the way a news media presents the news can cause political cynicism.

They have the tools to set the political mood of a society. They have the tools to sow political unrest. They first destroy the spirit through an information war, after which they can easily destroy the body either through economic/financial blackmail or war. Softening your opposition and making it susceptible collapse is what propaganda and psy-ops is all about. Therefore, keep this in mind next time you read news articles produced by Armenian news outlets based in the US or come across news reports put out by Armenia's Western-led political opposition. Most of the news reports and political commentaries put out by sources are designed to convey outrage and hopelessness amongst Armenians. They are meant to break down the spirit and sow the seeds of political unrest. 

Therefore, be mindful: "Press freedom", "human rights", "civil society" and "democratic progress" are essentially code words for allowing Western assets in Armenia a free hand to meddle in the internal affairs of the country and sow social and political discontent. This is not a recent phenomenon. Washington has been perfecting its ability to sow unrest in targeted nations since the 1950s. The author of a recently published book on the infamous Dulles brothers had the following to say in a recent interview -
"[The Dulles brothers] were able to succeed [at regime change] in Iran and Guatemala because those were democratic societies, they were open societies. They had free press; there were all kinds of independent organizations; there were professional groups; there were labor unions; there were student groups; there were religious organizations. When you have an open society, it's very easy for covert operatives to penetrate that society and corrupt it." 
The freer a society is, the more vulnerable it is to manipulation and exploitation by higher powers. Dwell on this notion for a while. We have seen nations like Serbia, Georgia, Libya, Iraq, Syria and Ukraine suffer devastating losses due to Western meddling. Not wanting to follow suit nations like Russia, China, Egypt, Iran and Venezuela are forced to tighten their control over society to stop Western meddling. It is truly unfortunate that freedom has to be curtailed to stop imperial exploitationIt is truly tragic that human progress is being stunted due to Western machinations. But this is where we are today and this has to be acknowledged. Today we have a convergence of interests between Neo-Bolsheviks (civil society groups funded by Soros-like leftist entities in the Western world) and traditional Western imperialists. The aforementioned two have joined hands and are seeking to topple governments not under Anglo-American-Jewish rule. They have the money. They have the tools. They have the expertise. They have the experience. They have the following. They control the global control board. When they are given the freedom to operate in an targeted country, they waste no time in sowing their seeds of sociopolitical unrest.

Yerevan is vulnerable to this kind of foreign manipulation precisely because Armenia has more than ample political freedoms. In fact, politically, Armenia is much freer than the US. When was the last time the US had political parties and political activists as diverse or as violent or as competitive as the ones that exist in Armenia? Never. Political diversity is not an advantage, it's a serious problem. Western world has been powerful because of its entrenched elite, not because of its fictitious political freedoms. Had political diversity been a healthy thing for developing nations, Western powers would not be pushing it upon them. What Armenia needs today is tighter control of its Western funded news agencies, NGOs and activists. What Yerevan needs to do is limit its exposure to Western powers. What Yerevan also needs to do its place individuals and organizations that maintain ties with Western entities under constant surveillance. Having an open society is a serious liability for an embattled country like Armenia because political activism, humanitarian aid, financial assistance, independent journalism and information are being used as weapons of mass destruction by Western powers. We have seen enough examples in recent years. Armenia is too small. Armenians are too few. We Armenians simply cannot afford the kind of mistakes made by Serbians, Georgians and Ukrainians.

Arevordi
February, 2015

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Many countries see USA as greatest threat to world peace

The U.S. government has a long history of aggressive military actions against other countries, but it seems there are no plans for the US government to stop.
An increasing number of nations turn against the U.S. Many take various actions to get rid of  the US influence, Pravda.Ru says. 
In a recent article entitled, "The Decline and Fall of the United States" David Swanson pointed out that, "Latin American nations are standing up to the United States. Some have kicked out its bases and ceased sending students to the School of the Americas. People are protesting at US bases in Italy, South Korea, England, and at US embassies in the Philippines, Czech Republic, and Ukraine. German courts are hearing charges that it is illegally participating in US drone wars. Pakistani courts have indicted top CIA officials."
The U.S. Embassy in Libya remains closed; not long ago the embassy in Yemen closed and we can expect others to follow suit in the future. Even if the U.S. is the most powerful militarily, if the nations and people of the world no longer want its presence in their countries, there is little that Washington can do anything about it. The U.S. government's extremely aggressive military policies are making new enemies at an alarming rate.
Wars are tormenting the Middle East from Syria to Iraq and Yemen. Those countries have been subjected to decades of oppression by foreign powers, including the United States. The fighting may easily spread to Pakistan, Somalia, Afghanistan, and any number of other Middle Eastern countries thanks to the efforts taken by George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Barack Obama.
The majority of the nations of the world view the United States of America as a great threat to world peace, Pravda.Ru says. The people of the world watched as the U.S. invaded, occupied and fought bloody, prolonged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, two relatively small counties with populations of less than 30 million; they saw how U.S. forces were held to a standstill by guerilla-style fighters in each of these countries. These rapidly growing militant groups in various Middle Eastern countries, such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda, have learned from the Taliban in Afghanistan and the Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq on how to go up against U.S. forces and prevail.
Pravda.Ru 
Full report here

Thursday, April 9, 2015

Czech president creates precedent of showing disobedience to USA

08.04.2015

 
Czech president creates precedent of showing disobedience to USA. Milos Zeman shows USA the door
Milos Zeman, the President of the Czech Republic, has recently created an important precedent, in which a vassal showed direct disobedience to its owner. Zeman is not a staunch ally of Russia, but he showed that his country was a sovereign republic, while the authorities of Eastern European countries have developed a habit of bowing their heads in obedience to the United States. 

Europeans rewrite history as Americans tell them

The story in question is Milos Zeman's reaction to the comment from US Ambassador Andrew Shapiro about his trip to the Victory Parade in Moscow. Shapiro, speaking on Czech television, said that the decision of the leader of one of the EU member states was "short-sighted", as it "discredited" common position of the West towards Russia. 
"I'm not going to allow any ambassador to interfere with my travel plans," Mr. Zeman told a local news agency. "I can't imagine the Czech ambassador in Washington would give advice to the American president where to travel," said Zeman.
According to the Czech president, he is going to Moscow as a token of gratitude for not speaking German in the Czech Republic. "Without the Soviet Union, defeating Hitler would have been impossible. The price for that was 20 million lives," Milos Zeman said. 
President Zeman said in an interview with online publication Parlamentni Listy on Sunday that the door of Prague Castle was closed to the U.S. ambassador. "Ambassador Schapiro has the door to the castle closed," the Czech president said. 
The reaction from Czech political circles was negative. Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka said he wished President Milos Zeman was more professional in his diplomatic language. 
"Zeman's statement once again proves that he lacks tact and diplomatic thinking," said the Speaker of the Parliament Premysl Sobotka. Sobotka stressed that Ambassador Shapiro was still free to come to the upper house of the Czech Parliament. The president does not want it to see him, but we do, stressed Sobotka.
"His reaction harms our relations with the United States, which is a key ally of the Czech Republic. The incident also confirms the reputation of the president of the Czech Republic as one of the main supporters of the Kremlin and its policies," former Czech EU commissioner Pavel Telička said. 
According to Czech publications (that the Germans bought a long time ago), the main conclusion is as follows. Czech President Zeman sees no problem in Russia's policies, such as the "annexation" of the Crimea and the support of "separatists" in Ukraine. We are so tempted to say: do not see the problem in the fact that you are rewriting history under the pressure of the Americans?
"A fresh diplomatic row erupted Sunday between the pro-Russian president of the Czech Republic and the U.S., reflecting a widening gap between the head of the small European Union state and his own country's politicians, allies and public," writes The Wall Street Journal. The American newspaper is not right in opposing the whole Czech society to Zeman. A survey conducted by Czech website Tyden said that 50 percent of respondents agree with Zeman's position, whereas 47 - do not share the view of their president. Three percent were undecided.

President Zeman reminds USA of Czech sovereignty

Looking through comments in Czech newspapers, it becomes clear why President Zeman has so many supporters. The Czechs mostly support Zeman for his sovereign position. Many Czechs believe that the country that violates international law, bombed Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan, has no right to tell others how to behave in the international arena.
In addition, Czech citizens believe that the recent NATO march on the territory of the Czech Republic was demeaning. "We criticized the Soviet Union for its aggression, but what is the difference now? The same tanks, the same puppet government, but with a different sign," a poster wrote. 
Interestingly, the media of neighboring countries have their own approach to the diplomatic row. For example, SME of Slovakia said that Zeman's comments were "a useless gesture." "We believe that Zeman's remarks against the US Ambassador were like a lonesome cry in the dark, an example of an unsuccessful mobilization against American soldiers who have recently marched through the Czech Republic." 
The Slovak newspaper quoted statements from Slovak President Andrej Kiska, who tirelessly performs the functions of a US ally, criticizing Russia for its "contribution" to the conflict in Ukraine. Bulgarian President Rosen Plevneliev acts similarly. Yet, the Hungarian newspaper Magyar Nemzet shares an opposite position. "Zeman committed a very important act as a statesman, that should serve as a lesson for our country," the newspaper wrote.
Noteworthy, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban was vehemently opposed to Western sanctions against Russia. At the same time, he probably won't dare to come for the Victory Parade.
In conclusion, a few words about Russia's reaction. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said yesterday that the president of the Czech Republic Milos Zeman had "his own self-esteem and pride. Not all people are like this, unfortunately," the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry Sergei Lavrov told RIA Novosti.
"The Americans, in principle, try to hold back all countries in their relations with the Russian Federation, without exception, and this pressure makes me seriously doubt the adequacy of decisions," Lavrov said.
"Zeman targets the provincial electorate, - senior researcher at the Academic Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences (INION), Yulia Shcherbakova told Pravda.Ru. - Zeman was supported in the northeast, in industrial areas, in the southwest and in agricultural areas. In other words, Zeman eyes common people, and he expresses their point of view."
"The Americans have forgotten that the Czech Republic is an independent state and also a member of both the EU and NATO,"Russian diplomat, former counselor of the embassy in the Czech Republic, Oleg Lushnikov told Pravda.Ru. - In the Czech Republic, Zeman has plenty of enemies. There were attempts to made to impeach him, but Zeman has been through all of that." 
Lyuba Lulko
Pravda.Ru 
Read article in Russian on the Russian page of Pravda.Ru

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Topup tidak dikenakan GST

Pihak Kastam sila ambil tindakan ke atas telco yang berdegil untuk mengenakan GST ke atas topup yang dibeli pengguna. Ini menggambarkan pihak telco mengenakan GST secara penipuan. Semalam beli topup guna CIMB Clicks pun dari RM30 dah jadi RM31.80

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Tahniah buat pelabur ASB2

Berita gembira yang diumumkan PNB semalam apabila ASB2 mencatat agihan pendapatan sebanyak 7.75 sen seunit melibatkan pembayaran sebanyak RM92 juta bagi tahun kewangan berakhir pada 31 Mac 2015. Agihan pendapatan tersebut bakal memberi manfaat kepada 103,546 pemegang unit yang telah melanggan 2.06 billion unit ASB2. Agihan pendapatan tersebut melibatkan agihan pendapatan tahunan sebanyak 7.50 sen seunit dan agihan pendapatan khas sebanyak 0.25 sen seunit.

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Sejarah Amanah Saham Nasional (ASN) Ditubuhkan

Amanah Saham Nasional (ASN) ditubuhkan adalah berkait rapat dengan sifat bangsa melayu itu sendiri. Sepertimana yang saya sebutkan sebelum ini iaitu pemilikan ekuiti bumiputera (Klik di Sini) sebanyak 30% menjadi teras untuk menjayakan Dasar Ekonomi Baru (DEB). Apabila saham iaitu tawaran awam permulaan atau Initial Public Offer (IPO) dijual kepada orang ramai ketika syarikat berpindah daripada sendirian berhad kepada berhad atau syarikat berhad mahu menambah modal atau menyusun semula struktur pemilikan melalui saham baru, ia akan memperuntukkan sebanyak 30 peratus saham tersebut kepada bumiputera agar pegangan saham bumiputera meningkat mengikut peredaran masa.

Masalah Bumiputera

Apa yang menyedihkan ialah sebaik sahaja saham ini diperuntukkan kepada Bumiputera, sesetengah mereka akan menjualnya. Dan yang membelinya ialah orang cina kerana mereka bersedia membayar harga lebih tinggi daripada harga IPO. Dalam suasana pasaran saham yang baik, harga hampir semua saham IPO melonjak naik sebaik sahaja ia disenaraikan dan terus meningkat buat beberapa waktu.

Oleh kerana ingin mendapat untung mudah, golongan bumiputera menjual saham tersebut kepada spekulator cina. Tambahan pula ramai bumiputera meminjam daripada bank untuk membeli saham-saham IPO dan tidak mahu melambat-lambatkan bayaran balik pinjaman. Jadi, mereka menjual saham berkenaan dan membuat sedikit keuntungan selepas tolak pinjaman bank. Sesetengah orang cina yang inginkan saham tertentu membayar komisen atau upa kepada bumiputera untuk memohon saham IPO bagi pihak mereka. Selepas mendapat saham tersebut, tauke cina itu akan mengambil alih saham tersebut dan membayar upah kepada bumiputera atas khidmatnya.

Amalan jual janji saham IPO ini menjejaskan usaha menambah pemilikan bumiputera dalam sektor korporat. Sekiranya keadaan ini terus berlaku, matlamat DEB tidak akan tercapai. Apa yang lebih malang ia hanya akan menambah kekayaan orang bukan melayu.

Idea Badan Pengurusan Saham Amanah Ditubuhkan

Bagi mengatasi masalah orang melayu yang menjual saham-saham IPO yang diperuntukkan kepada meraka, maka sebuah badan pengurusan saham amanah perlu ditubuhkan. Badan ini boleh membeli saham-saham yang diperuntukkan kepada bumiputera di bawah DEB dan menjual unit-unit saham ini kepada individu bumiputera. Sekiranya mereka ingin menjual saham-saham ini, mereka hanya boleh menjual kepada pengurus saham amanah. Dengan cara ini, saham tidak akan dijual kepada orang bukan bumiputera.

Gabenor Bank Negara ketika itu, Tun Ismail Mohamed Ali diminta untuk menubuhkan sebuah tabung amanah bagi membeli saham-saham bumiputera. Syaratnya ialah tabung ini memberi pulangan lebih tinggi daripada simpanan tetap di dalam bank.

Lahirnya Amanah Saham Nasional (ASN)

Tun Ismail kemudian menubuhkan badan induk yang dikenali sebagai Yayasan Pelaburan Bumiputera (YPB). Sebanyak RM200 juta diperuntukkan oleh kerajaan kepada badan ini.  YPB kemudian menubuhkan PNB dan membiayainya bagi membeli saham-saham yang dikhaskan kepada bumiputera. Saham-saham ini akan dipindahkan ke sebuah tabung pengurusan saham yang dikenali sebagai Amanah Saham Nasional (ASN) sebelum saham ini dijual kepada bumiputera. Dengan ini, pemegang saham hanya boleh menjual balik unit-unit mereka kepada pihak PNB sahaja. Langkah ini sudah tentu dapat mencegah daripada saham-saham yang diperuntukkan kepada bumiputera jatuh ke tangan orang cina. 

Amanah Saham Nasional (ASN) dilancarkan secara rasminya pada 20 April 1981 oleh Perdana Menteri Ke-3, Tun Hussein Onn.

Kaum bumiputera khusus orang melayu diberi peluang untuk melabur di dalam Amanah Saham Nasional (ASN) ini sehinggakan saham bernilai RM10 diberikan kepada mereka untuk melabur dalam tabung amanah ini. Ini adalah untuk menimbulkan rasa bangga pada diri mereka kerana menyedari yang mereka juga mempunyai pegangan dalam kegiatan perniagaan dan syarikat-syarikat terkemuka negara.

Adakah anda sudah membuat pelaburan Amanah Saham Nasional (ASN) pada hari ini (Klik di Sini) ? Jika belum, buka akaun anda sekarang pada hari ini.

Sekian, terima kasih.

Sumber.
1. Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohammad, 2012. Doktor Umum : Memoir Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohammad.  Berita Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Sejarah “Dawn Raid” — Serang Hendap Kuala Lumpur Ke Atas Kota London pada 1981


55
wang malaysiaOleh: Lela Iskandar Suhaimi

Kisah benar kejayaan sekumpulan anak Melayu mengambil kembali tanah-tanah di Malaysia yang dipegang Inggeris selama 160 tahun dengan serangan terancang ke atas ibu kota Britain

Pada 7 haribulan September tahun 1981, kota London digemparkan dengan pengambilalihan mengejut syarikat perladangan Guthrie di London. Guthrie yang berusia lebih 100 tahun dan merupakan antara syarikat perladangan terbesar British jatuh ke tangan pihak asing di dalam masa 4 jam sahaja.
Apa yang lebih mengejutkan ialah syarikat tersebut jatuh ke tangan kerajaan Malaysia, di bawah pimpinan Dr. Mahathir Muhammad yang baru memegang jawatan Perdana Menteri selama 2 bulan.

Latarbelakang – Kemiskinan Orang Melayu dan Kekayaan Orang Inggeris

sawah
Pemandangan yang lazim selepas merdeka –seorang pesawah wanita sedang menanam anak padi
Selepas kemerdekaan Malaya pada tahun 1957, hampir 1 juta bangsa pendatang seperti Cina dan India diberi kerakyatan secara beransur-ansur. Sebagai balasannya, mereka bersetuju untuk menghormati hak istimewa orang Melayu dalam perlembagaan.
Setelah lebih 10 tahun merdeka, pegangan orang Melayu terhadap kekayaan bumi Malaya sangat kecil. Walaupun orang Melayu merupakan majoriti , bangsa ini memegang hanya 1.5% bahagian harta korporat (itupun melalui syarikat kerajaan) berbanding bangsa Cina sebanyak 22.8%. Walaupun tidak lagi menjajah, bangsa Inggeris pula memegang lebih 60 % dari kekayaan negara ini.
Pada masa yang sama, hampir separuh penduduk Malaya tinggal di bawah paras kemiskinan. Orang Melayu yang kebanyakannya tinggal di kampung sebagai petani dan pesawah adalah bangsa paling ramai tinggal dalam kemiskinan (74%).
Ketidaksamarataan kekayaan dan sikap perkauman tebal menyebabkan beberapa insiden pergaduhan terjadi berulang-ulang diantara kaum pribumi yang miskin (Melayu) dengan kaum pendatang yang kaya (Cina). Ia berlaku di beberapa tempat seperti di Georgetown, Pangkor dan Bukit Mertajam — sehinggalah kemuncaknya pada tahun 1969 di Kuala Lumpur.
Dalam keputusan pilihanraya tahun itu, parti-parti bangsa Cina dan parti Islam berjaya menafikan majoriti parlimen parti pemerintah, sekaligus menyebabkan orang Melayu gusar kehilangan bukan sahaja kuasa ekonomi malah kuasa politik mereka. Orang Cina pula merayakan kemenangan mereka dengan berarak membawa penyapu dan melemparkan laungan provokatif dalam perarakan besar di Kampung Baru , Kuala Lumpur – satu kawasan penempatan yang dihuni kaum Melayu.
Provokasi ini akhirnya mencetuskan insiden berdarah 13 Mei 1969 yang mengakibatkan ratusan mati dan darurat di isytiharkan.
Antara pihak yang lantang menyalahkan kerajaan pada waktu yang dianggap memberi muka kepada kaum pendatang ialah seorang ahli parti pemerintah bernama Mahathir Mohammad yang mengkritik Perdana Menteri pertama dengan satu surat terbuka.
Katanya sikap berlembut Tunku Abdul Rahman menyebabkan “… orang2 China dan India membuat kurang ajar pada 12 Mei kepada orang Melayu. Kalau Tunku biasa di-ludah di-muka, di-maki dan di-tunjok kemaluan, boleh-lah Tunku faham perasaan orang Melayu.”
Kerana kritikan ini, beliau dipecat dari parti itu.

Dasar Bagi Membantu Orang Melayu

Apabila Tun Abdul Razak menjadi perdana menteri ke-2 (1970-1976) beliau memperkenalkan satu dasar yang dianggap radikal yang diberi nama Dasar Ekonomi Baru (DEB). Tujuannya — menghapuskan kemiskinan bangsa Melayu dan memastikan agar pegangan orang Melayu dalam kekayaan negara dapat mencapai 30% pada tahun 1990. Dasar ini bukan saja akan membantu orang Melayu, tetapi juga boleh mengelakkan krisis antara kaum terjadi lagi.
Walaupun adanya dasar baru ini, pemilikan syarikat-syarikat Inggeris sebenarnya semakin bertambah. Guthrie contohnya, mempunyai 175,000 ekar pada tahun 1970an tetapi memiliki lebih 190,000 ekar tanah kelapa sawit, getah dan teh pada tahun 1981.
Sekitar tahun 1970an juga, seorang hartawan bijih timah Cina dari Ipoh bernama Lee Loy Seng giat membeli tanah pertanian dari British sehingga menyebabkan beliau menjadi salah seorang pemegang tanah terbesar di negara ini.
Pada masa yang sama, syarikat-syarikat British melengah-lengahkan usaha kerjasama dengan kerajaan dengan mengadakan perjumpaan demi perjumpaan dengan wakil kerajaan tanpa sebarang resolusi. Guthrie juga menolak usaha kerajaan untuk penanaman semula getah untuk pekebun kecil Melayu dan penubuhan kesatuan sekerja yang dianggap menyusahkan British.
Tetapi atas tekanan Bank Negara Malaysia, Guthrie akhirnya menubuhkan Guthrie-Ropel, sebuah anak syarikat Guthrie yang diberi kurang 17% dari jumlah tanah Guthrie di Malaysia. Usaha kerajaan ini bertujuan agar orang tempatan dapat membeli sebahagian kecil tanah Guthrie melalui Bursa Saham Kuala Lumpur. Namun begitu, tembelang British akhirnya pecah apabila didapati bahawa kebanyakan tanah kepunyaan Guthrie-Ropel adalah tanah yang buruk untuk pertanian dan lazimnya terletak di atas kawasan bukit.

Pemerintah Anti-Penjajah, Mahathir Menduduki Kerusi Penting

mahathir
Mahathir sewaktu sidang PBB
Mahathir yang diterima masuk semula pada 3 tahun selepas dipecat, akhirnya menjawat kerusi Perdana Menteri pada tahun 1981.
Berbeza dari 3 Perdana Menteri sebelum ini, Mahathir dirakamkan oleh ahli sejarah sebagai Perdana Menteri pertama yang tidak merokok, tidak minum arak dan tidak meminati sukan golf. Dan jika pemegang jawatan sebelum beliau berdarah raja, berpendidikan British dan mengekalkan hubungan baik dengan Inggeris, Mahathir pula belajar di Universiti Malaya Singapura, tidak mempunyai rakan berbangsa Inggeris dan terkenal dengan sikap anti-penjajahnya.
Sebelum menjadi Perdana Menteri lagi, beliau mengkritik dasar Inggeris yang membuka Tanah Melayu seluas-luasnya kepada pendatang dari India dan China, sekaligus menyebabkan orang Melayu terpinggir.
2 tahun sebelum beliau menjadi Perdana Menteri, pihak Inggeris menarik semula subsidi pendidikan kepada pelajar Malaysia yang melanjutkan pelajaran di Britain dan menaikkan yuran kepada pelajar asing, tetapi tidak kepada pelajar Eropah.
Ia memberikan tamparan hebat kepada 17,000 pelajar Malaysia di negara itu yang terbeban dengan yuran pengajian yang meningkat 3 kali ganda secara tiba-tiba. Malaysia juga pada waktu itu tidak mampu menyerap pelajar-pelajar ini kerana ia hanya mempunyai 2 buah universiti.
Mahathir yang ketika itu merupakan Menteri Perdagangan memberi amaran bahwa tindakan ini akan merugikan Britain dalam jangka masa panjang. Namun begitu, amaran beliau tidak diendahkan.
Tidak lama kemudian, London menolak permohonan Malaysia agar syarikat penerbangan MAS diberi hak mendarat tambahan di lapangan terbang Heathrow. Tetapi pada masa yang sama, Inggeris mencabar kewibawaan kerajaan Malaysia apabila sebuah pesawat supersonic Concorde miliknya menceroboh ruang antarabangsa Subang dalam perjalanannya ke Singapura.
Mahathir melihat ini sebagai sikap angkuh British yang masih memperlakukan Malaysia seperti tanah jajahannya.

Dato Ismail Ali Sebagai Pemimpin Serangan

wang malaysia
Tandatangan Ismail atas wang kertas 50 ringgit Malaysia sewaktu menjadi gabenor bank negara.
Keangkuhan British bukan sahaja disedari oleh Mahathir dan ahli-ahli politik Melayu, tetapi turut dirasai oleh penjawat awam seperti pengerusi PNB, Dato Ismail Ali. Secara kebetulan, abang ipar Mahathir ini juga adalah bekas Gabenor Bank Negara yang terlibat menggesa Guthrie menubuhkan Guthrie-Ropel.
Beliau juga adalah antara tokoh utama yang menubuhkan PNB — satu agensi yang ditugaskan khas bagi menjayakan DEB.
Sewaktu menjawat jawatan gabenor Bank Negara lagi, beliau menunjukkan sikap tidak mesra kepada Inggeris. Mark Gent, iaitu pengerusi Guthrie ketika itu berkata, beliau dan pengarah urusan Guthrie, Eric Griffith-Jones hampir pasti akan diarah oleh Ismail Ali untuk “menunggu diluar pejabatnya selama ½ jam” setiap kali mesyuarat diadakan.
Sewaktu Ismail menjadi gabenor juga, wang negara yang disimpan di bank Inggeris seperti HSBC dan Chartered dipindahkan ke bank tempatan. Bank-bank asing pula tidak lagi diberi peluang membuka cawangan di Malaysia.
Seperti Mahathir, beliau juga tidak berpuashati dengan orang Inggeris kerana sungguhpun PNB memiliki 25% saham Guthrie, tiada wakil PNB yang dirujuk dalam mesyuarat untuk menentukan halatuju syarikat. Ini termasuk keputusan Guthrie menjual beberapa kepentingannya kepada MPH, sebuah syarikat koperasi milik hartawan-hartawan Cina di Malaysia pada awal 1981.
Syarikat MPH yang memiliki aset yang banyak ini pernah cuba membeli bank UMBC (iaitu antara bank terbesar negara ketika itu) sehingga menyebabkan Mahathir campurtangan. Agar ia tidak didominasi bangsa Cina, Mahathir memastikan PERNAS dan Petronas juga mempunyai kepentingan dalam UMBC.
Kedua-dua tokoh ini melihat bahawa jika pengambilalihan demi pengambilalihan MPH diteruskan, bangsa Cina semakin hampir mengganti orang Inggeris menguasai ekonomi negara ini.
Atas sebab ini, Ismail membuat keputusan nekad. Guthrie mesti diambilalih secepat mungkin.

Kerjasama Pelbagai Pihak

Setahun sebelum menjadi Perdana Menteri, Mahathir yang merupakan Menteri Perdagangan dan Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah selaku Menteri Kewangan telah di maklumkan oleh Ismail Ali bahawa beliau merancang untuk mengejutkan Inggeris dengan pengambilalihan syarikat mereka.
4 bulan sebelum serangan, pasukan di PNB yang diterajui oleh pengurus pelaburan bernama Khalid Ibrahim diberi tugas khas untuk meneliti dan merangka strategi bagi memastikan semua berjalan lancar.
Khalid yang pernah bekerja di Barings London (iaitu syarikat yang menjadi penasihat kewangan Guthrie), pakar-pakar pelaburan PNB dan penasihat dari bank saudagar N. M. Rothschild & Sons Ltd diarahkan untuk mengkaji secara rahsia samada Guthrie boleh diambilalih. Jika positif, mereka diarahkan merangka strategi terperinci bagaimana ianya boleh dibuat.
Hasil dari penelitian mereka, kumpulan ini menjumpai satu kelemahan dalam akta bursa saham London yang boleh dieksploitasi. Dengan kelemahan ini, satu serang hendap ekonomi untuk mengambilalih Guthrie boleh dibuat. Syaratnya ianya dibuat sepantas dan serahsia mungkin hingga Inggeris tidak sempat melakukan pertahanan.
Dengan persetujuan Mahathir, modal pengambilalihan (sebanyak 282 juta pound) diambil dari tiga punca – Petronas, PERNAS dan menerusi satu skim amanah saham baru yang ditawarkan kepada orang Melayu 4 bulan sebelum serangan. Skim ini dinamakan Amanah Saham Nasional (ASN).
Untuk memastikan Inggeris tidak menyedari bahawa kerajaan Malaysia berada di belakang pengambilalihan ini, Khalid diarahkan oleh Rothschilds untuk membuka bank akaun di Switzerland untuk tujuan pembayaran saham.

Mengapa Guthrie ?

Guthrie menjadi sasaran kerana selain dimiliki pelabur Ingeris, saham-saham Guthrie pada waktu itu juga dipegang oleh beberapa syarikat bukan Inggeris yang mesra kepada PNB. Antara syarikat tersebut antaranya adalah Genting, Bank Simpanan Nasional, Kuwait Investment Office dan OCBC.
Dengan pegangan sedia ada sebanyak 25%, PNB memerlukan 15% saham sahaja lagi bagi menjadikan keseluruhan pegangannya ke 40% , sekaligus menjadikannya sebagai pemegang saham utama Guthrie.
Untuk ini, N. M. Rothschild & Sons Ltd dilantik bagi membeli saham Guthrie dari pelabur besar bagi pihak PNB, manakala Rowe & Pittman pula dilantik menjadi broker bagi membeli saham Guthrie dari pelabur-pelabur kecil.
Ideanya di sini ialah agar sebahagian besar saham Guthrie di Malaysia dan di London dibeli serentak sebelum bursa dibuka, dan ia mesti dibeli tanpa disedari oleh pihak pengurusan Guthrie sendiri.
Untuk memastikan kejayaan serangan rahsia ini, hanya sekumpulan kecil perancang sahaja yang terlibat secara langsung. Mohammad Desa Pachi, yang juga Ketua Eksekutif PNB ketika itu juga tidak diberitahu secara terperinci bagaimana operasi ini akan dilaksanakan.

Operasi Serangan Subuh atau “Dawn Raid”

Hari serangan akhirnya diputuskan — 7 September, pukul 9 pagi waktu London (4 petang waktu Malaysia).
Mengikut rancangan, kesemua yang terlibat akan mendapatkan persetujuan penjual-penjual sebelum bursa dibuka. Apabila ia dibuka, PNB akan mengisytiharkan berita menggemparkan ini dan menguruskan dokumentasinya sahaja — sekaligus memberi kejutan kepada Guthrie dan pemegang saham lain.
Yang rumitnya ialah memastikan pembelian ini dilakukan secara rahsia. Kerana jika ia terbongkar awal, harga saham Guthrie bakal melambung tinggi dan pengurusan Guthrie akan bertindakbalas untuk menggagalkan serangan hendap ini.
Di Malaysia Khalid yang diberi tugas menguruskan pembelian di sini optimis bahawa Bank Simpanan, Genting dan Kuwait Investment Group akan menerima tawaran PNB kerana ketiga-tiganya dianggap “mesra” dengan PNB.
Dato Ismail pula bergegas ke Singapura pada hari itu untuk berjumpa dengan pengerusi OCBC. Rancangannya ialah untuk meyakinkan pihak OCBC untuk menerima tawaran membeli saham Guthrie yang dipegang bank itu pada pukul 3:30 ptg, dan menghantar notis penerimaan pada pukul 3:45 petang.
Di London, Rowe & Pittman serta Rothschilds hanya menunggu lampu hijau dari Malaysia untuk membeli saham-saham Guthrie dari pelabur Inggeris pada pagi tersebut.
Sewaktu di Singapura, Ismail dan pengerusi OCBC, Tan Chin Tuan berbincang mengenai pembelian saham Guthrie sewaktu makan tengahari. Perbincangan yang memakan masa lama itu akhirnya berakhir dengan satu berita kurang enak. OCBC menolak tawaran PNB.
Ismail menelefon Khalid dan memberitahu berita buruk tersebut. Tetapi oleh kerana Khalid telah berjaya membeli saham dari Kuwait, Bank Simpanan dan Genting, mereka tiada jalan lain kecuali meneruskan serangan.
Di London, sebaik menerima lampu hijau, kedua-dua firma yang diupah PNB memulakan proses pembelian sepantas mungkin. Bank saudagar Rothschilds berjaya memujuk M&G Investment Trust, sebuah syarikat amanah saham Inggeris (yang memegang 17% dari Guthrie) menjual 11% saham Guthrie miliknya.
Broker-broker Rowe & Pittman yang ditugaskan membeli saham dari pelabur kecil Britain pula berjaya mengumpulkan sasaran 5% saham dari orang Inggeris.
Walaupun tanpa saham OCBC, dalam masa 4 jam, PNB berjaya memiliki 8 juta saham, atau 50.41% dari keseluruhan syarikat, tanpa disedari atau keizinan pihak pengurusan Guthrie.
Lewat tengahari waktu London, Guthrie jatuh ke dalam genggaman Malaysia.

Mahathir Terus Menekan British

glasgow report
Laporan akhbar Glasgow Herald di London pada 8 Sept 1981
Pengerusi Guthrie, Mark Gent hanya sedar bahawa bahawa syarikatnya jatuh ke tangan Malaysia setelah mendengar berita itu di radio.
Pengambilalihan secara tiba-tiba dengan mengeksploitasi kelemahan system bursa London oleh tanah jajahannya sendiri menyebabkan kerajaan British malu besar.
Walaupun ada broker di London memujinya sebagai urusniaga “licik”, media London kebanyakannya menyelar serangan ini sebagai “nasionalisasi pintu belakang”. Sebagai tindakbalas, London kemudiannya bertindak meminda peraturan di Bursa Saham London bagi memastikan syarikat-syarikat lain milik British seperti Dunlop tidak jatuh dengan cara sama.
Sebulan selepas itu, London dikejutkan lagi dengan pengumuman baru Mahathir.
Mahathir mengumumkan bahawa Malaysia akan memboikot barangan dan perkidmatan dengan British melalui kempen yang dinamakan Buy British Last. Mahathir yang marah kerana spekulasi timah dunia di London mengakibatkan harga eksport utama Malaysia jatuh mendadak, telah mengarahkan agar semua kontrak kerajaan kepada pihak British dibekukan.
Tindakan Mahathir ini memberi kesan besar kepada kontrak semasa dan akan datang British berjumlah 1.25 billion pound sterling yang sepatutnya diterima oleh British. Kontrak Dunlop untuk membekal tayar kepada kerajaan sejak 1963 lagi contohnya kini diberi kepada sebuah syarikat Amerika Syarikat sehingga menyebabkan Dunlop menjual kepentingan mereka kepada MPH.
Dalam masa 3 bulan, saham-saham Guthrie perlahan-lahan dijual kepada PNB. Pada akhir tahun 1981, 100% Guthrie berada di bawah pegangan anak tempatan.
Ismail akhirnya mengambilalih pengurusan Guthrie dan memindahkan ibu pejabat operasi Guthrie dari London ke Kuala Lumpur sebagai tanda berakhirnya penguasaan Inggeris ke atas syarikat tersebut.
Tidak lama selepas Dawn Raid juga, Mahathir memboikot Persidangan Negara-Negara Komanwel (negara bekas jajahan British) yang diterajui oleh Britain. Menurutnya, mesyuarat itu hanya melebihkan kepentingan orang berkulit putih.
Beliau juga mengumumkan dasar baru kerajaan iaitu Dasar Pandang ke Timur. Dengan dasar ini , cara kerja Inggeris akan digantikan dengan cara pengurusan dan kerja orang Jepun, Taiwan dan Korea.

Hasil Besar dari Serangan

Operasi mengejut “serangan subuh” ke atas Guthrie dan dasar-dasar keras Mahathir memberi impak besar dalam masa yang cukup singkat.
Firma-firma British di Malaysia yang sebelum ini bersikap acuh tidak acuh kepada arahan kerajaan Malaysia kini akur membuka pintu rundingan.
Tidak lama selepas itu, tiga syarikat perladangan besar British di Malaysia — Highlands & Lowlands, Barlows dan Harrisons & Crosfield (H&C) akhirnya tunduk menjual kepentingan mereka di Malaysia kepada PNB. Hasilnya, tanah milik Guthrie dan tanah-tanah lain milik Inggeris di Malaysia kembali ke tangan rakyat Malaysia.
Oleh kerana H&C memiliki tanah ladang getah, kelapa sawit dan aset bukan sahaja di Malaysia tetapi di negara lain seperti di India, New Zealand dan Taiwan, PNB juga menjadi tuan tanah baru kepada asset-aset Inggeris dari seluruh dunia.
Dengan pemilikan baru ini, PNB selaku wakil orang Melayu muncul sebagai pemilik tanah ladang terbesar di dunia.
Lebih manis lagi, dalam temuramah dengan wartawan tempatan, Khalid memberitahu bahawa setelah PNB menjual aset Guthrie di luar Malaysia, keuntungan yang didapati melebihi jumlah kos yang diguna sewaktu Dawn Raid.
Kata Khalid “..kita sebenarnya mendapat Guthrie secara percuma.”


Nota:
1. Penulis merakamkan jutaan terima kasih kepada Dr. Shakila Yacob atas kesudian memberi manuskrip kajian beliau bersama Nicholas J. White untuk rujukan penulis.
2. Penulis memaparkan tulisan ini sebagai rencana ilmiah, dan tidak berminat untuk memihak kepada mana-mana individu atau parti politik.
3. Penulis mendapati terdapat sumbangan penting tokoh-tokoh lain dalam Dawn Raid seperti Ananda Krishnan dan Tengku Razaleigh. Tidak disebut dlm artikel ini kerana kekurangan sumber maklumat.
4. Loophole/kelemahan bursa London pada waktu itu tidak diperincikan untuk memudahkan pemahaman pembaca.
Rujukan:
  1. Shakila Yacob & Khadijah Md Khalid (2012): Adapt or Divest? The New Economic Policy and Foreign Businesses in Malaysia (1970-2000), The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 40:3, 459-482
  2. Shakila Yacob & Nicholas J. White (2010): The “Unfinished Business” of Malaysia’s Decolonisation: The Origins of the Guthrie Dawn Raid, Cambridge University Press 2010
  3. Karminder Singh Dhillo (2009): Malaysia Foreign Policy in the Mahathir Era, 1981-2003: Dilemmas of Development
  4. Brian Ritchie (2005): Coalitional Politics, Economic Reform, and Technological Upgrading in Malaysia, Elsevier World Development Vol 33, pp 745-761
  5. Abdul Rahman Embong (1996): Social Transformation, the State and the Middle Classes in Post-Independence Malaysia, Southeast Asian Studies, V01. 34, No. 3, December 1996
  6. Boon Kheng Cheah (2002) : Malaysia: The Making of a Nation
  7. Tin Price Moves Jolt Market : Reuters (The New York Times); Financial Desk, November 28, 1981, Saturday
  8. Surat Terbuka Dr. Mahathir kepada Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jun 1969
  9. PNB Wrests Control of Guthrie Corp : The Straits Times Singapore, September 9, 1981
  10. PNB Making Up For Lost Time: The Straits Times Singapore, September 16, 1981